Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

A bibliometric analysis of literature on malaria vector resistance: (1996 – 2015)

  • 1,
  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 3 and
  • 1
Globalization and Health201612:76

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0214-4

©  The Author(s). 2016

  • Received: 24 September 2016
  • Accepted: 8 November 2016
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Emergence of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors is a real threat to future goals of elimination and control of malaria. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess research trend on insecticide resistance of Anopheles mosquito. In specific, number of publications, countries, institutions, and authors’ research profile, citation analysis, international collaborations, and impact of journals publishing documents on insecticide resistance will be presented. It was conducted via Scopus search engine which was used to retrieve relevant data. Keywords used were based on literature available on this topic. The duration of study was set from 1996–2015.

Results

A total of 616 documents, mainly as original research articles (n = 569; 92.37%) were retrieved. The average number of citations per article was 26.36. Poisson log-linear regression analysis indicated that there was a 6.00% increase in the number of publications for each extra article on pyrethroid resistance. A total of 82 different countries and 1922 authors participated in publishing retrieved articles. The United Kingdom (UK) ranked first in number of publications followed by the United States of America (USA) and France. The top ten productive countries included seven African countries. The UK had collaborations mostly with Benin (relative link strength = 46). A total of 1817 institution/ organizations participated in the publication of retrieved articles. The most active institution/ organization was Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine. Retrieved articles were published in 134 different scientific peer reviewed journals. The journal that published most on this topic was Malaria Journal (n = 101; 16.4%). Four of the top active authors were from South Africa and two were from the UK. Three of the top ten cited articles were published in Insect Molecular Biology journal. Six articles were about pyrethroid resistance and at least two were about DDT resistance.

Conclusion

Publications on insecticide resistance in malaria vector has gained momentum in the past decade. International collaborations enhanced the knowledge about the situation of vector resistance in countries with endemic malaria. Molecular biology of insecticide resistance is the key issue in understanding and overcoming this emerging problems.

Keywords

  • Malaria
  • Vector
  • Anopheles
  • Resistance
  • Insecticide
  • Pyrethroids

Background

The most common and dangerous malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum is transmitted by Anopheles gambiae. More than 100 species of Anopheles mosquito have been implicated in the transmission of human malaria. Prevention and reduction of malaria transmission requires control of Anopheles mosquito which can be done through insecticide – treated mosquito nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) [1, 2]. The World Health Organization (WHO) approved the use of several insecticides for control of malaria vector. These insecticides belong to four chemical classes: organochlorines, organophosphates, carbamates andpyrethroids. For safety reasons, only pyrethroidsare suitable and safe for use in ITNs and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) while all approved insecticides are used and recommended for IRS [3–5].

The WHO is working toward an ambitious goal for the period 2016–2030 regarding control and elimination of malaria from different world regions [6], and future management of water resources in Africa, waste water irrigation, and water lifting devices [7–9]. The previous two decades had witnessed great achievements regarding malaria control [10, 11]. However, several challenges are facing the international agenda to control malaria by 2030. Most important challenges are the emergence of resistance to the new generation antimalarial drug resistance, artemisinins and the emergence of resistance among malaria vectors to common insecticides [12–19]. Insecticide resistance in malaria vectors is becoming a global concern because of reports on insecticide resistance from many countries in Africa [20–24]. Of particular concern is vector resistance to pyrethroids since they are the only class of insecticides approved for use in ITNs.

Research on insecticide resistance is highly needed in order to understand epidemiology and prevalence of the problem, the molecular mechanism of resistance, and to find strategies to overcome this problem. An initial step in understanding the size of the problem of insecticide resistance is analysis of available data and literature on this topic in order to assess what has been achieved. Actually, the intensive work of researchers in all fields of malaria has contributed to the control of this fatal infectious diseases. For example, Nobel Prize in 2015 was awarded for scientists who developed the artemisnins drugs which contributed significantly to malaria control [25–28].

Bibliometric analysis is a field in which several parameters and techniques are used in order to assess the volume, scientific impact, and trend of research on a particular topic. Bibliometric studies on insecticides in general have been carried out [29, 30]. Furthermore, bibliometric studies on malaria have also been published [31–35]. However, no biliometric studies have carried out on insecticide resistance of malaria vector. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess and map research output on insecticide resistance of Anopheles mosquito, the malaria vector. In specific, the overall volume of publications, country, institution and author research profile on insecticides resistance will be presented. Furthermore, citation analysis, international collaborations, and impact of journals publishing on insecticide resistance of Anopheles mosquito will also be presented. Therefore, this study will be a new addition to the literature of malaria in general and insecticide resistance in malaria vectorsin particular. Research activity in vector-borne diseases is considered a priority for many world regions like Africa and South East Asia. Furthermore, research in vector-borne diseases must respond to the dynamic changes of these diseases and insecticide resistance is an emerging concern in this field in general and in malaria in particular. This was the major motive for this study.

Methods

Scopus database was used to search for all published articles on insecticide resistance in malaria vector. Use of Scopus as a search engine was justifiable given the advantage that Scopus has over other databases [36]. Keywords used were those listed as insecticides for malaria vector control plus keywords pertaining to insecticides used in nets and residual spraying. These keywords were used in the title/ abstract fields. These keywords were used in combination with the word resistance or resistant. Retrieved documents were manually checked for validity of search strategy and articles that were outside the scope were deleted by adding the phrase “AND NOT” to the search query. For example, some of retrieved articles were about lice and scabies and had to be deleted. Manual validation was carried out by two of the co-authors who were aware of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Analysis of retrieved articles included listing bibliometric indicators mentioned in previous studies [37–49]. Analysis of results included regression models since this has been utilized successfully in previous studies [50–53]. Country, institution, source title, and authors were presented as top ten active items.

Collaboration between countries was presented as percentage of single country publication (SCP) and percentage of multiple country publication (MCP). The SCP represents intra-country collaboration while MCP represents inter country collaboration. Citation analysis for countries and journals was presented using VOSviewer technique [54]. The technique generates map that are either as density or network visualization maps. The map can be generated based on certain criteria set by the researchers. The impact of retrieved articles was assessed using Hirsch-index (h-index) [55]. The strength of journals publishing articles on malaria vector resistance was assessed by impact factor (IF) obtained from Journal Citation Report 2015.

Results

Publications’ numbers and citations

Results of the search query yielded a total of 616 documents, mainly as original research articles (n = 569; 92.37%). Most retrieved articles were in English (n = 588; 95.45%). The number of publications on insecticide resistance in malaria vector showed a dramatic growth in the past two decades (Fig. 1). The number of publications reached 73 documents in 2014 while there were only 4 documents published in 1996. The total number of citations of retrieved documents was 16238. Therefore, the average number of citations per article was 26.36. A total of 569 (92.37%) articles had at least one citation while 47 (7.63%) articles had no citations. The h-index of retrieved articles was 60. A scatter plot of the number of publications on vector resistance versus time yielded a straight line with a significant correlation and r value of 0.955. Poisson log-linear regression analysis indicated that publications on pyrethroid resistance is a significant predictor of worldwide research productivity on insecticide resistance in malaria vector. The model showed that the worldwide productivity will be 1.06 times greater for each extra article on pyrethroid resistance in malaria vector. In other words, there is a 6.00% increase in the number of publications for each extra article on pyrethroid resistance.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Growth of publications on malaria vector resistance to insecticides (1996–2015)

Publications analysis based on authors and countries

A total of 82 different countries and 1922 authors contributed to the publication of retrieved articles. Therefore, the average number of authors per article was 3.12. Of the 82 countries, there were 34 African countries and 12 Asian countries. The top ten productive countries were shown in Table 1. The United Kingdom (UK) ranked first followed by the United States of America (USA) and France. The productivity of countries in the top ten list was made mainly through international collaboration. The top list included seven African countries, one Asian, and three western countries. More than 90% of articles produced by the UK, France, Burkina Faso, Kenya, Cameron and Tanzania were produced by multiple authors from different countries, i.e. international collaboration. India has the least international collaboration followed by South Africa. VOSviewer network visualization map showed that the UK had collaborations mostly with Benin (relative link strength = 46) and the USA (relative link strength =37). For the USA, collaboration was mostly with the UK and Kenya (relative link strength = 17). For France, collaboration was mostly with the UK (relative link strength = 31) and Cote d’Ivoire (relative link strength = 21) (Fig. 2). Analysis of citation counts for countries with a minimum productivity of 10 documents showed that the UK had the largest citations followed by France, Benin, and the USA (Fig. 3).
Table 1

Top ten productive countries and international collaboration in malaria vector resistance to insecticides (1996–2015)

Rank

 

Publicationsa

%a

SCP

%

MCP

%

1st

UK

211

34.25

21

9.95

190

90.05

2nd

USA

119

19.32

23

19.33

96

80.67

3rd

France

95

15.42

6

6.32

89

93.68

4th

Benin

92

14.94

14

15.22

78

84.78

5th

South Africa

70

11.36

27

38.57

43

61.43

6th

India

54

8.77

50

92.59

4

7.41

7th

Cote d’Ivoire

42

6.82

5

11.90

37

88.10

8th

Burkina Faso

38

6.17

0

0.00

38

100.00

9th

Kenya

30

4.87

0

0.00

30

100.00

10th

Cameroon

29

4.71

1

3.45

28

96.55

10th

Tanzania

29

4.71

1

3.45

28

96.55

Abbreviation: USA United States of America, UK United Kingdom, SCP single country publications (intra-country collaboration), MCP multiple country publication (inter-country collaboration)

aNumbers do not add up to the total of 616 due to overall created by international collaboration

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Network visualization map for country collaboration. A minimum of 5 documents per country was a set as threshold and 44 countries were included in the map. The thickness of the link between any two countries is indicative of extent of co-authorships (collaboration)

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Density visualization map for country citations. The minimum was set at 10 documents per country and included 22 countries. Countries with the highest number of citations have darker spot. In the map, the UK, Benin, Francs and the USA had the darkest spots, i.e. highest citations

Publications analysis based on institutions

A total of 1817 institutions/ organizations participated in the publication of retrieved articles. Therefore, an average of 2.95 different affiliations were present per article which is almost similar to the average number of authors per article. Most active institutions/ organizations involved in insecticide resistance are shown in Table 2. The most active institution/ organization was Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine followed by London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Half of top ten productive institutions were in Africa, two in the UK, one in France and one was WHO. Articles published by WHO and center MURAZ(Burkina Faso) had the highest percentage of highly cites articles. Four of the top active institutions/ organizations were academic institutions while the remaining where research centers or health organizations. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) ranked 11th with 21 publications. The National Institute of Malaria Research in India was the only Asian institution/ organization in the top active list. This institute had the lowest percentage of highly cited articles relative to those in the top active list.
Table 2

Top productive institutions/ organizations in malaria vector resistance to insecticides (1996–2015)

Rank

Institute

Affiliation country

Publications

%a N = 616

HCA

%

1

Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine

UK

118

19.16

60

50.85

2

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

UK

73

11.85

40

54.79

3

University of Witwatersrand

South Africa

72

11.69

26

36.11

4

IRD Centre de Montpellier

France

66

10.71

33

50.00

5

Centre de RechercheEntomologique de Cotonou

Benin

60

9.74

21

35.00

6

National Institute for Communicable Diseases

South Africa

51

8.28

22

43.14

7

University of Abomey-Calavi

Benin

29

4.71

5

17.24

8

National Institute of Malaria Research India

India

25

4.06

4

16.00

9

OrganisationMondiale de la Sante

WHO

22

3.57

13

59.09

9

Centre MURAZ

Burkina Faso

22

3.57

13

59.09

abecause of the overlap in publications, the percentages maybe greater than 100%

Abbreviation: UK United Kingdom, USA United States of America, HCA highly cited articles (had a citations ≥ 20)

Publications analysis based on journals in which they were published

Retrieved articles were published in 134 different scientific peer reviewed journals. The journal that published most in this topic was Malaria Journal (n = 101; 16.40%) followed distantly by Parasites and Vectors journal (60, 9.74%). The top ten active journals in publishing articles on insecticide resistance are shown in Table 3. The total number of articles published by top ten journals was 333 articles equivalent to 54.06% of total retrieved articles. The total IF of articles published by top ten journals was 904.01, an average of 2.71 per article.
Table 3

Top ten productive journal in malaria vector resistance to insecticides (1996–2015)

Rank

Journal

Frequency

%

IF

TIF

1st

Malaria Journal

101

16.40

3.079

310.979

2nd

Parasites And Vectors

60

9.74

3.234

194.040

3rd

Plos One

44

7.14

3.540

155.760

4th

Journal Of Medical Entomology

25

4.06

1.712

42.800

4th

Medical And Veterinary Entomology

25

4.06

2.230

55.750

6th

American Journal Of Tropical Medicine And Hygiene

20

3.25

1.670

33.400

7th

Transactions Of The Royal Society Of Tropical Medicine And Hygiene

18

2.92

1.790

32.220

8th

ActaTropica

14

2.27

1.840

25.760

9th

Insect Molecular Biology

13

2.11

3.150

40.950

9th

Journal Of The American Mosquito Control Association

13

2.11

0.950

12.350

Total

 

904.009

Abbreviation: IF impact factor, TIF total impact factor

VOSviewer density visualization of citation density of e top ten productive journals shows that Malaria Journal had the highest number of citations followed by Parasites and Vectors journal and Medical and Veterinary Entomology journal (Fig. 4). Co-citation analysis of journals with a minimum of 250 citation yielded 11 journals with the strongest link was between Malaria Journal and American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (link strength = 2178) followed by the link between Malaria Journal and Medical and veterinary Entomology (link strength = 1717) (Fig. 5).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Density visualization map of citations for top journals in publishing articles on malaria vector resistance to insecticides (1996–2015)

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Network visualization map of co-citations for top journals in publishing articles on malaria vector resistance to insecticides (1996–2015)

Publications analysis based on the most active authors

Authors active in insecticide resistance are shown in Table 4. The top active authors belonged to different countries and institutional affiliations. Four of the top active authors were from South Africa and there were from the UK. One author in the top list was from South East Asia, particularly from Thailand. VOSviewer co-authorship analysis (Fig. 6) showed that the top active authors existed in 4 different clusters seen in four different colors. The co-citation analysis showed that seven of the top active authors were usually co-cited together (Fig. 7).
Table 4

Top active authors in publishing articles on malaria vector resistance to insecticides (1996 – 2015)

Author

Frequency

%

Affiliationa

Co-citation1

Co-authorship2

Ranson, H.

63

10.23

Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool, United Kingdom

red

red

Akogbéto, M.

62

10.06

Centre de RechercheEntomologique de Cotonou, Cotonou, Benin

green

blue

Chandre, F.

49

7.95

IRD Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement, Paris, France

green

green

Coetzee, M.

49

7.95

National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Vector Control Reference Unit, Johannesburg, South Africa

red

Yellowish green

Hemingway, J.

49

7.95

Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom

red

red

Brooke, B.D.

38

6.17

National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Centre for Opportunistic, Johannesburg, South Africa

red

Yellowish green

Koekemoer, L.L.

38

6.17

School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Johannesburg, South Africa

red

Yellowish green

N’Guessan, R. 3

38

3.41

Moshi, Pan-African Malaria Vector Research Consortium (PAMVERC), Tanzania OR London, UK

green

blue

Corbel, V.

32

5.19

Kasetsart University, Department of Entomology, Bangkok, Thailand

green

green

Hunt, R.H.

30

4.87

School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Johannesburg, South Africa

red

red

Donnelly, M.J.

21

3.41

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

red

Yellowish green

aAffiliation was obtained from author profile as shown in Scopus

● 1, 2 refer to the color of the cluster in Figs. 6 and 7 in which the authors are located

● 3 the author has 2 profiles in Scopus which were put together

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Density visualization map of author co-citation analysis. Authors within the same color cluster are co-cited together. Three clusters were obtained with red, blue and green colors. The map was created with a minimum of 250 citations per author which included 30 authors

Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Density visualization map for author co-authorship analysis using a minimum of 11 documents per author which included 34 authors. Each color represents a group of authors with research collaboration

Publications analysis based on top cited articles

Top ten cited articles are shown in Table 5 [56–65]. At least four of the top ten cited articles were authored/ co-authored by Professor Ranson, H. Three of the top ten cited articles were published in Insect Molecular Biology journal. Six articles were about pyrethroid resistance and at least two were about DDT resistance. Pyrethroid Knockdown resistance (kdr), voltage-gated sodium channel gene, and voltage-gated sodium channel gene were main molecular biology topics in the top ten cited articles. The highest number of citations obtained was 444 for the article entitled “Molecular characterization of pyrethroid Knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiaes.s.” [56].
Table 5

Top ten cited articles on malaria vector resistance to insecticides (1996–2015)

Rank

Author

Year

Title

Number of citations

1st

Martinez-Torres et al. [56]

1998

“Molecular characterization of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiaes.s.”

444

2nd

Hemingway et al. [57]

2004

“The molecular basis of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes”

357

3rd

Ranson et al. [58]

2011

“Pyrethroid resistance in African anopheline mosquitoes: What are the implications for malaria control?”

323

4th

Hargreaves et al. [59]

2000

“Anopheles funestus resistant to pyrethroid insecticides in South Africa”

318

5th

Ranson et al. [60]

2000

“Identification of a point mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Kenyan Anopheles gambiae associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroids”

291

6th

Ranson et al. [61]

2002

“Evolution of supergene families associated with insecticide resistance”

282

7th

Enayati et al. [62]

2005

“Insect glutathione transferases and insecticide resistance”

275

8th

N’Guessan et al. [63]

2007

“Reduced efficacy of insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying for malaria control in pyrethroid resistance area, Benin”

256

9th

Chandre et al. [64]

1999

“Status of pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles gambiaesensulato”

222

10th

Ranson et al. [65]

2001

“Identification of a novel class of insect glutathione S-transferases involved in resistance to DDT in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae”

215

Discussion

Resistance to insecticides

The objective of this study was to give a bibliometric overview of the resistance of the malaria vector to the approved insecticide. The timing of this study is important for at least three reasons: First, several international agencies are preparing strategic plans to control and eliminate malaria in the coming decade. Second, the resistance of malaria vector to pyrethroidis is escalating [66] and finally, 3) pyrethroid resistance will have serious implications on malaria vector control and thus malaria infection control [58]. Our study showed a noticeable increase in insecticide resistance in 2006. Several reasons could be cited to explain this rise, for example, the extensive use of pyrethroids in ITN, LLINs, and IRS in the past two decades is one reason [63, 67]. Furthermore, the extensive use of DDT and bendiocard in IRS contributed to this resistance. The utilization of insecticides in agriculture to control crop pests is also a potential reason for the emergence of malaria mosquito resistance [68].

Resistance to pyrithroids

The high citations and h-index of retrieved articles on insecticide resistance is indicative of the importance of this issue [69, 70]. Malaria is one of the major global public health concerns and the control of malaria is a priority for many African countries. Such control cannot be achieved without controlling the vector. The use of insecticides in ITNs, LLINs and IRS was a success story and created an impressive reduction in malaria burden for countries in Africa and other continents [71]. The news for vector resistance attracted the attention of researchers, international organizations and health bodies and elicited a wave of publications regarding epidemiology, health consequences and molecular biology behind this resistance. Actually, the news on insecticide resistance reached a situation that needs an urgent action at all levels including research to maintain the success in malaria control [19]. Our study also showed that publications on pyrethroid resistance is a strong significant predictor of worldwide publication on malaria vector resistance. This is not surprising given that synthetic pyrethroids are the only WHO-recommended insecticides in treated nets [72]. The potential loss of pyrethroids as a weapon in fighting malaria vector was an alarming news to those involved in malaria control and initiated more extensive molecular research on this issue as well as research on developing effective and safe alternatives to pyrethroids in treated nets. Furthermore, in response to these alarming reports, the WHO developed the Global Plan for Insecticide Resistance Management in Malaria Vectors (GPIRM) [72].

Active countries in research related to insecticide resistance of malaria vector

Our study showed that 34 African countries participated in the publications of retrieved articles on insecticide resistance. According to the WHO and since 2010, at least 60 countries have reported resistance to at least one class of insecticide and at least 49 countries have reported resistance to at least two or more different classes [73]. In Africa, resistance have been reported from many countries [24, 74–84]. Of particular importance are the African countries in which insecticide resistance has been shown to all four classes of insecticide. Such countries include Cote D’Ivoire and Mali [16, 85]. The involvement of the African countries in malaria research in general, and in insecticide resistance in particular, came largely through international collaboration as indicative of percentage of MCP from African countries listed in the top ten list. It is true that such countries have been suffering from malaria and other tropical diseases and it is a must to follow up in research on these disease, however, the limited expertise and resources of these countries necessitates the collaboration with other western developed countries particularly the UK and France given the historic relations between these countries and Africa. A description of benefits gained by collaboration was elaborated in an article discussing the China-Africa collaboration in malaria control and elimination [86]. Our study showed that four active institutions focusing on insecticide resistance were located in Africa, particularly South Africa, Benin and Burkina Faso. Of particular importance is the National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD) in South Africa which provides information on communicable diseases to support the government’s response to disease threats [73]. Although, the focus of vector resistance is directed toward Africa, other parts of the world in which malaria is an endemic disease had also participated in research and publications on this issue. Countries like India, China, Thailand and other Asian and South American countries have also contributed to the publications [16, 87–92]. Insecticide resistance in south eastern region and in Mekong area in particular has become of major threat given the reported resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to the most effective anti-malarial, artemisinin drugs [93, 94].

Journals that published the most articles

Our study showed that Malaria Journal was the most active in publishing articles on vector resistance. It is the only journal that is dedicated for malaria research in the general sense. However, journals in tropical medicine, parasitology and medical entomology were also heavily involved in publishing work related to malaria vector insecticide resistance. The top active journals in malaria vector resistance had an IF suggesting that such topic is of an interest to editors of prestigious and strong journals. Of the top active journals, PLoS One journal is the only multidisciplinary journal that published articles of original research from all fields of science and medicine. The Malaria Journal played the central role in malaria research in general as shown in VOSviewer map where Malaria Journal had the largest number of citations compared to other journals is being commonly co-cited with almost all active journals. Again, regardless of the IF, the number of citations is indicative of the power and authority in the field of interest. The fact that malaria vector resistance is relatively a new topic, most of the retrieved documents were original research articles and less than 6% (34) of the retrieved documents were reviews, conference papers, editorials, letters and notes.

Articles citation

Our study showed that articles on molecular mechanisms of malaria vector resistance are being mostly cited. This interest in the molecular biology aspects of insecticide resistance is most likely motivated by the search for new novel insecticides that are less prone to resistance. Point mutations in mosquitos described as Knockdown resistance (kdr) was extensively investigated to understand the molecular aspects of Anopheles mosquito resistance. Knockdown resistance (kdr) is the most common form of insecticide resistance and has been reported in many African and Asian countries [20, 81, 95–104]. One of the top cited articles also discussed the role of voltage gated sodium channels in insecticide resistance. The most common form of kdr is a mutation in voltage gated sodium channels in the central nervous system of the mosquito [102, 105–108]. Additionally, the role of glutathione transferases in conferring metabolic resistance was discussed in at least two of the top cited articles. Glutathione transferase is a form of metabolic detoxification in malaria vector. Such metabolic detoxification also includes alteration in P450 monooxygenases and esterases [109–113].

Authors’ analysis

Our study showed that the most active authors were in South Africa in addition to authors in the UK, France and other countries. The top active authors in South Africa are being co-cited with active authors in the UK and VOSviewer showed that authors in South Africa and the UK have joint collaboration in this regard. South Africa is one of the African countries that had successfully controlled and confined malaria [114–118]. Actually, regional and international collaboration with African countries in malaria control programs had yielded positive results in malaria control [119].

This study is the first to discuss malaria vector resistance to insecticides. However, the authors acknowledge that this study has few limitations that need to be addressed. The fact that not all journal, particularly those issued from Africa or Asia, are indexed in Scopus made the number of retrieved documents less than the true accurate number. Furthermore, the authors did their best to use all keywords that are relevant to the topic and did a manual check for the retrieved articles, however a limited number of false positive or negative remain a possibility. With regard to the ranking, the authors extracted the information as is from Scopus. However, due to different spelling of authors or institutions, it is possible that some authors have multiple affiliations that the authors were not aware of and thus the ranking might not be 100% accurate. Finally, in VOSviewer, we always used a minimum number or threshold to draw the maps, thus not all the items are shown. Not being shown in the map does not mean that the item is not important or that the authors were biased toward any particular item. The authors were aware of all these limitations and did their best to minimize it to an acceptable level.

Conclusion

Our study showed that publications on malaria vector resistance to insecticides is gaining momentum in the past decade. African countries and institutions had positive and noticeable contribution to publications in this topic. International collaborations with African countries in this field was also significant. Publications on this topic appeared in high impact journal and had high citations and h-index indicative of readability and quality. Molecular biology aspects of insecticide resistance were the most cited articles in the field. Authors from South Africa and the UK had noticeable collaboration and contribution to malaria vector resistance. Further research, collaboration, and funding is needed to investigate the epidemiology and molecular biology of this topic.

Implications and future work

Studies investigating anopheles target-organ resistance is recommended, in addition to strategies to combat insecticide resistance must be kept a priority. Cross-resistance should be also investigated, as well as, the ecology of the target pest, novel biochemical targets, and new chemical approaches for pest control and the implications of utilizing more and newer insecticides.

Abbreviations

WHO: 

World Health Organization

ITN: 

Insecticide treated nets

IRS: 

Indoor residual spraying

Kdr: 

Knockdown resistance

Declarations

Acknowledgment

Not Applicable.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

all data present in this article can be retrieved from Scopus using keywords listed in the methodology.

Authors’ contributions

WS was involved in study design, data collection, statistical analysis, data interpretation, and drafting of manuscript; SZ, SA, and AA were involved in study concept and design, and revised the article for important intellectual content; AS and NS carried out the data validation, results tabulation, statistical analysis, and wrote the methodology of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript and agreed on its submission.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Physiology, Pharmacology, Toxicology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, 44839, Palestine
(2)
Department of Clinical and Community Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, 44839, Palestine
(3)
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Technology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, 44839, Palestine

References

  1. Russell TL, Beebe NW, Cooper RD, Lobo NF, Burkot TR. Successful malaria elimination strategies require interventions that target changing vector behaviours. Malar J. 2013;12(1):56.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kweka EJ, Mazigo HD, Munga S, Magesa SM, Mboera LEG. Challenges to malaria control and success stories in Africa. Glob Health Perspect. 2013;1(2):71–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Fullman N, Burstein R, Lim SS, Medlin C, Gakidou E. Nets, spray or both? The effectiveness of insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying in reducing malaria morbidity and child mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. Malar J. 2013;12(1):62.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. West PA, Protopopoff N, Wright A, Kivaju Z, Tigererwa R, Mosha FW, et al. Enhanced protection against malaria by indoor residual spraying in addition to insecticide treated nets: is it dependent on transmission intensity or net usage? PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0115661.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hamainza B, Sikaala CH, Moonga HB, Chanda J, Chinula D, Mwenda M, et al. Incremental impact upon malaria transmission of supplementing pyrethroid-impregnated long-lasting insecticidal nets with indoor residual spraying using pyrethroids or the organophosphate, pirimiphos methyl. Malar J. 2016;15(1):100.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. World Health Organization. Global technical strategy for malaria 2016–2030. World Health Organization. 2016. http://www.who.int/malaria/areas/global_technical_strategy/en/. Accessed 3 Aug 2016.
  7. Valipour M. Future of agricultural water management in Africa. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2015;61(7):907–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Valipour M, Singh VP. Global Experiences on Wastewater Irrigation: Challenges and Prospects. Balanced Urban Development: Options and Strategies for Liveable Cities. Springer; 2016. p. 289–327.Google Scholar
  9. Yannopoulos S, Lyberatos G, Theodossiou N, Li W, Valipour M, Tamburrino A, et al. Evolution of water lifting devices (pumps) over the centuries worldwide. Water. 2015;7(9):5031–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Haines A, Cassels A. Can the millennium development goals be attained? BMJ. 2004;329(7462):394–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Murray CJL, Rosenfeld LC, Lim SS, Andrews KG, Foreman KJ, Haring D, et al. Global malaria mortality between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2012;379(9814):413–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Canavati SE, Lawford HL, Fatunmbi BS, Lek D, Top-Samphor N, Leang R, et al. Establishing research priorities for malaria elimination in the context of the emergency response to artemisinin resistance framework-the Cambodian approach. Malar J. 2016;15:120.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferreira MU, Castro MC. Challenges for malaria elimination in Brazil. Malar J. 2016;15(1):284.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Guyant P, Corbel V, Guerin PJ, Lautissier A, Nosten F, Boyer S, et al. Past and new challenges for malaria control and elimination: the role of operational research for innovation in designing interventions. Malar J. 2015;14:279.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kramer RA, Lesser A. Sustaining the gains made in malaria control and elimination. Infect Dis Poverty. 2015;4:26.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Mnzava AP, Macdonald MB, Knox TB, Temu EA, Shiff CJ. Malaria vector control at a crossroads: public health entomology and the drive to elimination. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2014;108(9):550–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Sande S, Zimba M, Chinwada P, Masendu HT, Mberikunshe J, Makuwaza A. A review of new challenges and prospects for malaria elimination in Mutare and Mutasa Districts, Zimbabwe. Malar J. 2016;15(1):360.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Sinha S, Medhi B, Sehgal R. Challenges of drug-resistant malaria. Parasite. 2014;21:61.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ranson H, Lissenden N. Insecticide resistance in African anopheles mosquitoes: a worsening situation that needs urgent action to maintain malaria control. Trends Parasitol. 2016;32(3):187–96.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Cisse MB, Keita C, Dicko A, Dengela D, Coleman J, Lucas B, et al. Characterizing the insecticide resistance of anopheles gambiae in Mali. Malar J. 2015;14:327.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Hemingway J, Ranson H, Magill A, Kolaczinski J, Fornadel C, Gimnig J, et al. Averting a malaria disaster: will insecticide resistance derail malaria control? Lancet. 2016;387(10029):1785–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ngufor C, N’Guessan R, Fagbohoun J, Subramaniam K, Odjo A, Fongnikin A, et al. Insecticide resistance profile of anopheles gambiae from a phase II field station in cove, southern Benin: implications for the evaluation of novel vector control products. Malar J. 2015;14:464.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Quinones ML, Norris DE, Conn JE, Moreno M, Burkot TR, Bugoro H, et al. Insecticide resistance in areas under investigation by the International Centers of Excellence for malaria research: a challenge for malaria control and elimination. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93(3 Suppl):69–78.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Soko W, Chimbari MJ, Mukaratirwa S. Insecticide resistance in malaria-transmitting mosquitoes in Zimbabwe: a review. Infect Dis Poverty. 2015;4:46.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Chen WJ. Honoring antiparasitics: the 2015 nobel prize in physiology or medicine. Biomed J. 2016;39(2):93–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Tambo E, Khater EI, Chen JH, Bergquist R, Zhou XN. Nobel prize for the artemisinin and ivermectin discoveries: a great boost towards elimination of the global infectious diseases of poverty. Infect Dis Poverty. 2015;4:58.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhai X, Wang Q, Li M. Tu Youyou’s nobel prize and the academic evaluation system in China. Lancet. 2016;387(10029):1722.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang RW. Artemisinin (Qinghaosu), nobel prize, anti-malaria, and beyond. Chin J Nat Med. 2016;14(1):1–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sinha B. Global biopesticide research trends: a bibliometric assessment. Indian J Agr Sci. 2012;82(2):95–101.Google Scholar
  30. Rothman H, Lester G. The use of bibliometric indicators in the study of insecticide research. Scientometrics. 1985;8(3–4):247–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Gupta BM, Bala A. A bibliometric analysis of malaria research in India during 1998–2009. J Vector Borne Dis. 2011;48(3):163–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Garg KC, Kumar S, Madhavi Y, Bahl M. Bibliometrics of global malaria vaccine research. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(1):22–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Maharana RK. Malaria research in India during 2003–2012: a bibliometric analysis. Collect Build. 2014;33(2):53–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. van Eijk AM, Hill J, Povall S, Reynolds A, Wong H, Ter Kuile FO. The malaria in pregnancy library: a bibliometric review. Malar J. 2012;11(1):362.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Munoz-Urbano M, Lopez-Isaza AF, Hurtado-Hurtado N, Gomez-Suta D, Murillo-Abadia J, Delgado-Osorio N, et al. Scientific research in malaria: bibliometric assessment of the Latin-American contributions. Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov. 2014;9(3):209–15.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):338–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Sweileh WM, Al-Jabi SW, Abuzanat A, Sawalha AF, AbuTaha AS, Ghanim MA, et al. Assessment of research productivity of Arab countries in the field of infectious diseases using web of science database. Infect Dis Poverty. 2015;4(1):2.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Sweileh WM, Al-Jabi SW, Shanti YI, Sawalha AF, Zyoud SH. Contribution of Arab researchers to ophthalmology: a bibliometric and comparative analysis. Springerplus. 2015;4:42.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Sweileh WM, Shraim NY, Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW. Worldwide research productivity on tramadol: a bibliometric analysis. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1108.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Sweileh WM, Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF. Contribution of Arab countries to breast cancer research: comparison with non-Arab Middle Eastern countries. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:25.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Zyoud SH. Bibliometric analysis on global Catha edulis (khat) research production during the period of 1952–2014. Global Health. 2015;11:39.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Zyoud SH. Global research trends of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16(1):255.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Zyoud SH. Dengue research: a bibliometric analysis of worldwide and Arab publications during 1872–2015. Virol J. 2016;13:78.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM. Scientific publications from Arab world in leading journals of integrative and complementary medicine: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15:308.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Al-Khalil S, Alqub M, Awang R. Global methaemoglobinaemia research output (1940–2013): a bibliometric analysis. Springerplus. 2015;4:626.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Al-Khalil S, Sawalha AF, Awang R. The Arab world’s contribution to solid waste literature: a bibliometric analysis. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2015;10:35.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Awang R. Contribution of Arab countries to pharmaceutical wastewater literature: a bibliometric and comparative analysis of research output. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2016;28:28.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Awang R, Waring WS. Global research productivity of N-acetylcysteine use in paracetamol overdose: a bibliometric analysis (1976–2012). Hum Exp Toxicol. 2015;34(10):1006–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Awang R, Waring WS. Bibliometric profile of the global scientific research on methanol poisoning (1902–2012). J Occup Med Toxicol. 2015;10:17.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Khoshravesh M, Sefidkouhi MAG, Valipour M. Estimation of reference evapotranspiration using multivariate fractional polynomial, Bayesian regression, and robust regression models in three arid environments. Appl Water Sci. 2015. doi:10.1007/s13201-015-0368-x.
  51. Valipour M, Eslamian S. Analysis of potential evapotranspiration using 11 modified temperature-based models. Intern J Hydro Sci Tech. 2014;4(3):192–207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Valipour M. Temperature analysis of reference evapotranspiration models. Meteorol Appl. 2015;22(3):385–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Valipour M. Evaluation of radiation methods to study potential evapotranspiration of 31 provinces. Meteorol Atmos Phys. 2015;127(3):289–303.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–38.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(46):16569–72.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Martinez-Torres D, Chandre F, Williamson MS, Darriet F, Berge JB, Devonshire AL, et al. Molecular characterization of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 1998;7(2):179–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Hemingway J, Hawkes NJ, McCarroll L, Ranson H. The molecular basis of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;34(7):653–65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Ranson H, N’Guessan R, Lines J, Moiroux N, Nkuni Z, Corbel V. Pyrethroid resistance in African anopheline mosquitoes: what are the implications for malaria control? Trends Parasitol. 2011;27(2):91–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Hargreaves K, Koekemoer LL, Brooke BD, Hunt RH, Mthembu J, Coetzee M. Anopheles funestus resistant to pyrethroid insecticides in South Africa. Med Vet Entomol. 2000;14(2):181–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Ranson H, Jensen B, Vulule JM, Wang X, Hemingway J, Collins FH. Identification of a point mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Kenyan anopheles gambiae associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroids. Insect Mol Biol. 2000;9(5):491–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Ranson H, Claudianos C, Ortelli F, Abgrall C, Hemingway J, Sharakhova MV, et al. Evolution of supergene families associated with insecticide resistance. Science. 2002;298(5591):179–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Enayati AA, Ranson H, Hemingway J. Insect glutathione transferases and insecticide resistance. Insect Mol Biol. 2005;14(1):3–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. N’Guessan R, Corbel V, Akogbeto M, Rowland M. Reduced efficacy of insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying for malaria control in pyrethroid resistance area, Benin. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13(2):199–206.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Chandre F, Darrier F, Manga L, Akogbeto M, Faye O, Mouchet J, et al. Status of pyrethroid resistance in anopheles gambiae sensu lato. Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(3):230–4.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Ranson H, Rossiter L, Ortelli F, Jensen B, Wang X, Roth CW, et al. Identification of a novel class of insect glutathione S-transferases involved in resistance to DDT in the malaria vector anopheles gambiae. Biochem J. 2001;359(Pt 2):295–304.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Santolamazza F, Calzetta M, Etang J, Barrese E, Dia I, Caccone A, et al. Distribution of knock-down resistance mutations in anopheles gambiae molecular forms in west and west-central Africa. Malar J. 2008;7(1):74.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Protopopoff N, Verhaeghen K, Van Bortel W, Roelants P, Marcotty T, Baza D, et al. A significant increase in kdr in anopheles gambiae is associated with an intensive vector control intervention in Burundi highlands. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13(12):1479–87.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Diabate A, Baldet T, Chandre F, Akoobeto M, Guiguemde TR, Darriet F, et al. The role of agricultural use of insecticides in resistance to pyrethroids in anopheles gambiae s.l. In Burkina Faso. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;67(6):617–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Chacin-Bonilla L. H-index: a new bibliometric indicator of the academic activity. Invest Clin. 2012;53(3):219–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Meneghini R. Citations to papers from Brazilian institutions: a more effective indicator to assess productivity and the impact of research in graduate programs. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2011;44(8):738–47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. World Health Organization. World malaria report 2014. 2014. http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world_malaria_report_2014/report/en/. Accessed 3 Aug 2016.
  72. World Health Organization. Global plan for insecticide resistance management in malaria vectors. 2012. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44846/1/9789241564472_eng.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2016.
  73. World Health Organization. Malaria: Insecticide resistance. 2015. http://www.who.int/malaria/areas/vector_control/insecticide_resistance/en/. Accessed 3 Aug 2016.
  74. Baleta A. Insecticide resistance threatens malaria control in Africa. Lancet. 2009;374(9701):1581–2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Choi KS, Christian R, Nardini L, Wood OR, Agubuzo E, Muleba M, et al. Insecticide resistance and role in malaria transmission of Anopheles funestus populations from Zambia and Zimbabwe. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:464.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Djegbe I, Boussari O, Sidick A, Martin T, Ranson H, Chandre F, et al. Dynamics of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors in Benin: first evidence of the presence of L1014S kdr mutation in anopheles gambiae from West Africa. Malar J. 2011;10:261.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Djouaka R, Irving H, Tukur Z, Wondji CS. Exploring mechanisms of multiple insecticide resistance in a population of the malaria vector anopheles funestus in Benin. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27760.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Hunt RH, Fuseini G, Knowles S, Stiles-Ocran J, Verster R, Kaiser ML, et al. Insecticide resistance in malaria vector mosquitoes at four localities in Ghana, West Africa. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:107.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Jones CM, Toe HK, Sanou A, Namountougou M, Hughes A, Diabate A, et al. Additional selection for insecticide resistance in urban malaria vectors: DDT resistance in anopheles arabiensis from Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. PloS one. 2012;7(9):e45995.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Namountougou M, Simard F, Baldet T, Diabate A, Ouedraogo JB, Martin T, et al. Multiple insecticide resistance in anopheles gambiae s.l. populations from Burkina Faso, West Africa. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48412.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. el Niang HA, Konate L, Diallo M, Faye O, Dia I. Patterns of insecticide resistance and knock down resistance (kdr) in malaria vectors An. arabiensis, An. coluzzii and An. gambiae from sympatric areas in Senegal. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:71.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Nkya TE, Akhouayri I, Poupardin R, Batengana B, Mosha F, Magesa S, et al. Insecticide resistance mechanisms associated with different environments in the malaria vector anopheles gambiae: a case study in Tanzania. Malar J. 2014;13:28.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Ole Sangba ML, Deketramete T, Wango SP, Kazanji M, Akogbeto M, Ndiath MO. Insecticide resistance status of the anopheles funestus population in Central African Republic: a challenge in the war. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):230.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Reid MC, McKenzie FE. The contribution of agricultural insecticide use to increasing insecticide resistance in African malaria vectors. Malar J. 2016;15:107.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Killeen GF. Characterizing, controlling and eliminating residual malaria transmission. Malar J. 2014;13:330.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Xia ZG, Wang RB, Wang DQ, Feng J, Zheng Q, Deng CS, et al. China-Africa cooperation initiatives in malaria control and elimination. Adv Parasitol. 2014;86:319–37.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Chareonviriyahpap T, Aum-aung B, Ratanatham S. Current insecticide resistance patterns in mosquito vectors in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1999;30(1):184–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Chareonviriyaphap T, Bangs MJ, Suwonkerd W, Kongmee M, Corbel V, Ngoen-Klan R. Review of insecticide resistance and behavioral avoidance of vectors of human diseases in Thailand. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6(1):280.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Cui F, Raymond M, Qiao CL. Insecticide resistance in vector mosquitoes in China. Pest Manag Sci. 2006;62(11):1013–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Singh OP, Raghavendra K, Nanda N, Mittal PK, Subbarao SK. Pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles culicifacies in Surat district, Gujarat, west India. Curr Sci. 2002;82(5):547–50.Google Scholar
  91. Van Bortel W, Trung HD, Thuan le K, Sochantha T, Socheat D, Sumrandee C, et al. The insecticide resistance status of malaria vectors in the Mekong region. Malar J. 2008;7:102.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Vatandoost H, Mashayekhi M, Abaie MR, Aflatoonian MR, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Sharifi I. Monitoring of insecticides resistance in main malaria vectors in a malarious area of Kahnooj district, Kerman province, southeastern Iran. J Vector Borne Dis. 2005;42(3):100–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Boulle M, Witkowski B, Duru V, Sriprawat K, Nair SK, McDew-White M, et al. Artemisinin-resistant plasmodium falciparum K13 mutant alleles, Thailand-Myanmar border. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(8):1503–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Tun KM, Jeeyapant A, Imwong M, Thein M, Aung SS, Hlaing TM, et al. Parasite clearance rates in upper Myanmar indicate a distinctive artemisinin resistance phenotype: a therapeutic efficacy study. Malar J. 2016;15:185.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Dykes CL, Das MK, Eapen A, Batra CP, Ghosh SK, Vijayan VA, et al. Knockdown Resistance (kdr) Mutations in Indian anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae) populations. J Med Entomol. 2016;53(2):315–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Dykes CL, Kushwah RB, Das MK, Sharma SN, Bhatt RM, Veer V, et al. Knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations in Indian anopheles culicifacies populations. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:333.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Kudom AA, Mensah BA, Froeschl G, Rinder H, Boakye D. DDT and pyrethroid resistance status and laboratory evaluation of bio-efficacy of long lasting insecticide treated nets against Culex quinquefasciatus and Culex decens in Ghana. Acta Trop. 2015;150:122–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Kushwah RB, Mallick PK, Ravikumar H, Dev V, Kapoor N, Adak TP, et al. Status of DDT and pyrethroid resistance in Indian Aedes albopictus and absence of knockdown resistance (kdr) mutation. J Vector Borne Dis. 2015;52(1):95–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Mitri C, Markianos K, Guelbeogo WM, Bischoff E, Gneme A, Eiglmeier K, et al. The kdr-bearing haplotype and susceptibility to Plasmodium falciparum in anopheles gambiae: genetic correlation and functional testing. Malar J. 2015;14:391.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Ndiath MO, Cailleau A, Orlandi-Pradines E, Bessell P, Pages F, Trape JF, et al. Emerging knock-down resistance in anopheles arabiensis populations of Dakar, Senegal: first evidence of a high prevalence of kdr-e mutation in West African urban area. Malar J. 2015;14:364.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Ndiath MO, Eiglmeier K, Ole Sangba ML, Holm I, Kazanji M, Vernick KD. Composition and genetics of malaria vector populations in the Central African Republic. Malar J. 2016;15(1):387.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Ochomo E, Subramaniam K, Kemei B, Rippon E, Bayoh NM, Kamau L, et al. Presence of the knockdown resistance mutation, Vgsc-1014 F in anopheles gambiae and An. arabiensis in western Kenya. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:616.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Platt N, Kwiatkowska RM, Irving H, Diabate A, Dabire R, Wondji CS. Target-site resistance mutations (kdr and RDL), but not metabolic resistance, negatively impact male mating competiveness in the malaria vector anopheles gambiae. Heredity (Edinb). 2015;115(3):243–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Zhang HW, Liu Y, Hu T, Zhou RM, Chen JS, Qian D, et al. Knockdown resistance of anopheles sinensis in Henan province, China. Malar J. 2015;14:137.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Kawada H, Oo SZ, Thaung S, Kawashima E, Maung YN, Thu HM, et al. Co-occurrence of point mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel of pyrethroid-resistant Aedes aegypti populations in Myanmar. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(7):e3032.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Silva AP, Santos JM, Martins AJ. Mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of anophelines and their association with resistance to pyrethroids - a review. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:450.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Singh OP, Dykes CL, Das MK, Pradhan S, Bhatt RM, Agrawal OP, et al. Presence of two alternative kdr-like mutations, L1014F and L1014S, and a novel mutation, V1010L, in the voltage gated Na + channel of Anopheles culicifacies from Orissa, India. Malar J. 2010;9:146.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Singh OP, Dykes CL, Lather M, Agrawal OP, Adak T. Knockdown resistance (kdr)-like mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel of a malaria vector anopheles stephensi and PCR assays for their detection. Malar J. 2011;10:59.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Aravindan V, Muthukumaravel S, Gunasekaran K. Interaction affinity of delta and epsilon class glutathione-s-transferases (GSTs) to bind with DDT for detoxification and conferring resistance in anopheles gambiae, a malaria vector. J Vector Borne Dis. 2014;51(1):8–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Balmert NJ, Rund SS, Ghazi JP, Zhou P, Duffield GE. Time-of-day specific changes in metabolic detoxification and insecticide resistance in the malaria mosquito anopheles gambiae. J Insect Physiol. 2014;64:30–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Mitchell SN, Rigden DJ, Dowd AJ, Lu F, Wilding CS, Weetman D, et al. Metabolic and target-site mechanisms combine to confer strong DDT resistance in anopheles gambiae. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92662.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Brooke BD, Kloke G, Hunt RH, Koekemoer LL, Temu EA, Taylor ME, et al. Bioassay and biochemical analyses of insecticide resistance in southern African anopheles funestus (Diptera: Culicidae). Bull Entomol Res. 2001;91(4):265–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. David JP, Strode C, Vontas J, Nikou D, Vaughan A, Pignatelli PM, et al. The anopheles gambiae detoxification chip: a highly specific microarray to study metabolic-based insecticide resistance in malaria vectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(11):4080–4.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Brooke B, Koekemoer L, Kruger P, Urbach J, Misiani E, Coetzee M. Malaria vector control in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2013;103(10 Pt 2):784–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Coetzee M, Kruger P, Hunt RH, Durrheim DN, Urbach J, Hansford CF. Malaria in South Africa: 110 years of learning to control the disease. S Afr Med J. 2013;103(10 Pt 2):770–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Maharaj R, Raman J, Morris N, Moonasar D, Durrheim DN, Seocharan I, et al. Epidemiology of malaria in South Africa: from control to elimination. S Afr Med J. 2013;103(10 Pt 2):779–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Moonasar D, Morris N, Kleinschmidt I, Maharaj R, Raman J, Mayet NT, et al. What will move malaria control to elimination in South Africa? S Afr Med J. 2013;103(10 Pt 2):801–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Moonasar D, Nuthulaganti T, Kruger PS, Mabuza A, Rasiswi ES, Benson FG, et al. Malaria control in South Africa 2000–2010: beyond MDG6. Malar J. 2012;11:294.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Sharp BL, Kleinschmidt I, Streat E, Maharaj R, Barnes KI, Durrheim DN, et al. Seven years of regional malaria control collaboration--Mozambique, South Africa, and Swaziland. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76(1):42–7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement

Globalization and Health

ISSN: 1744-8603