Table 6 CR Evaluation statistics
Hongkou District | Huangpu District | Jing'an District | Putuo District | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Index/% | Quantity/% | Index/% | Quantity/% | Index/% | Quantity/% | Index/% | Quantity/% | |
Very low quality | 0.531 (35.0%) | 38 (52.1%) | 0.039 (1.5%) | 2 (2.4%) | 0.889 (28.6%) | 58 (42.6%) | 1.268 (29.0%) | 80 (42.6%) |
Low quality | 0.67 (44.2%) | 27 (37.0%) | 1.062 (41.5%) | 43 (50.6%) | 1.06 (34.1%) | 43 (31.6%) | 1.442 (33.0%) | 60 (31.9%) |
Medium quality | 0.165 (10.9%) | 5 (6.8%) | 1.156 (45.2%) | 34 (40.0%) | 1.164 (37.4%) | 35 (25.7%) | 1.418 (32.5%) | 43 (22.9%) |
High quality | 0.151 (10.0%) | 3 (4.1%) | 0.299 (11.7%) | 6 (7.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.24 (5.5%) | 5 (2.7%) |
Very high quality | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Xuhui District | Yangpu District | Changning District | ||||||
Index/% | Quantity/% | Index/% | Quantity/% | Index/% | Quantity/% | |||
Very low quality | 0.623 (10.0%) | 37 (17.4%) | 1.378 (34.3%) | 90 (51.4%) | 0.413 (12.1%) | 26 (23.2%) | ||
Low quality | 2.018 (32.4%) | 82 (38.5%) | 1.151 (28.7%) | 48 (27.4%) | 0.906 (26.6%) | 37 (33.0%) | ||
Medium quality | 2.256 (36.2%) | 67 (31.5%) | 0.93 (23.2%) | 28 (16.0%) | 1.031 (30.3%) | 31 (27.7%) | ||
High quality | 1.193 (19.1%) | 25 (11.7%) | 0.302 (7.5%) | 6 (3.4%) | 0.66 (19.4%) | 13 (11.6%) | ||
Very high quality | 0.145 (2.3%) | 2 (0.9%) | 0.252 (6.3%) | 3 (1.7%) | 0.394 (11.6%) | 5 (4.5%) | ||