Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality of Studies

From: The barriers, facilitators and association of vaccine certificates on COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a scoping review

References

Was a clear research question posed?

Was the target population defined, and was the sample representative of the population?

Was a systematic approach used to develop the questionnaire?

Was the questionnaire tested?

Were questionnaires administered in a manner that limited both response and nonresponse bias?

Was the response rate reported, and were strategies used to optimize the response rate?

Were the results clearly and transparently reported?

Comments

Determinants and variations of COVID-19 vaccine uptake and responses among minority ethnic groups in Amsterdam, the Netherlands [22]

TRUE

TRUE

FALSE

FALSE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

Did not state if survey was tested or specify testing/development process of questionnaire used

Public policy measures to increase anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination rate in Russia [23]

TRUE

TRUE

FALSE

FALSE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

Did not state if survey was tested or specify testing/development process of questionnaire used

Persistence of vaccine hesitancy and acceptance of the EU Covid certificate among French students [24]

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

FALSE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

Target population was defined, but representativeness of the sample was described in the paper as a limitation (i.e. surveyed students who

were hesitant about vaccines against Covid-19 until very recently and who made their decision to be vaccinated later than their peers) Did not mention if survey was tested

The role of incentives in deciding to receive the available COVID-19 vaccine in Israel [25]

TRUE

TRUE

FALSE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

Target population was defined, but representativeness of the sample was described in the paper as a limitation (i.e. due to use of online recruitment methods, may not be representative of entire Israeli population/inclusive of minorities). Questionnaire was partly based on a previous questionnaire that was pilot-tested within the general public in June 2020

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a city with free choice and sufficient doses [26]

TRUE

FALSE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

 

The potential impact of vaccine passports on inclination to accept COVID-19 vaccinations in the United Kingdom: Evidence from a large cross-sectional survey and modeling study [27]

TRUE

TRUE

FALSE

FALSE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

Did not state if survey was tested or specify testing/development process of questionnaire used

COVID-19 vaccination mandates and vaccine uptake [28]

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

FALSE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

Did not explicitly state if the survey was tested

The effect of COVID certificates on vaccine uptake, health outcomes, and the economy [29]

TRUE

TRUE

FALSE

FALSE

TRUE

FALSE

TRUE

“Global COVID-19 Trends and Impact Survey” in partnership with Facebook—the questionnaire used to obtain survey data; the target population is unclear

The effect of mandatory COVID-19 certificates on vaccine uptake: synthetic-control modelling of six countries [30]

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

Does not explicitly state if the survey was tested

United States COVID-19 vaccination preferences (CVP): 2020 hindsight [31]

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

FALSE

TRUE

TRUE

Online survey (underrepresents those who are unable to use technology or are illiterate), but target population may be considered geographically and demographically representative

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in eight European countries: prevalence, determinants, and heterogeneity [32]

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

FALSE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

Did not explicitly state if the survey was tested

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and vaccine passports: a cross-sectional conjoint experiment in Japan [32]

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

FALSE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

Did not explicitly state if the survey was tested

Public attitudes to COVID-19 vaccines: a qualitative study [33]

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

FALSE

FALSE

TRUE

TRUE

People aged 50 + years were underrepresented in the final sample, participants met in online focus groups which could impact their responses. Did not explicitly state if the survey was tested

Exploring the impact of Quebec's vaccine lottery and vaccine passports on Covid-19 vaccination intention: Findings from repeated cross sectional surveys [34]

TRUE

TRUE

FALSE

FALSE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

Did not state if survey was tested or specify testing/development process of questionnaire used

Carrot-and-Stick, or Piling Coffins? Estimating the Role of Factors Overcoming COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Poland and Lithuania in the Years 2021–2022 [35]

       

N/A, no survey was used in this study and instead a weighted regression model was used

The effect of vaccine mandate announcements on vaccine uptake in Canada: An interrupted time series analysis [36]

       

N/A, no survey was used in this study and instead a time series analysis was conducted