Skip to main content

Table 6 Pattern of use of research evidence for policy/decision making among users of evidence

From: Building the capacity of users and producers of evidence in health policy and systems research for better control of endemic diseases in Nigeria: a situational analysis

Variables

Enugu (N = 21) n(%)

Anambra (N = 25)

n(%)

Difference

â–¡2(p-value)

Both (N = 46)

n(%)

Ever used evidence

20(95.2)

18(72.0)

4.290(0.038)

38(82.6)

Currently uses evidence

19(90.5)

19(76.0)

1.665(0.197)

38(82.6)

Type of evidence used

 Data from Federal Ministry of Health (including HMIS data)

7(35.0)

3(16.7)

 

10(26.4)

 Research evidence/Surveys

9(45.0)

14(77.8)

12.516(0.051)

23(60.5)

 Program Reports

0(0.0)

1(5.6)

 

1(2.6)

 Secondary data

1(5.0)

0(0.0)

 

1(2.6)

 Data Quality Assessment

2(10.0)

0(0.0)

 

2(5.3)

 Situation analysis

1(5.0)

0(0.0)

 

1(2.6)

 Ever used evidence from HPSR

12(57.1)

14(56.0)

0.006(0.938)

26(56.5)

Reason for not using evidence from HPSRa

 Not aware of the field of HPSR+A

6(28.6)

9(36.0)

0.287(0.592)

15(32.6)

 Lack of decision making autonomy

5(23.8)

5(20.0)

0.097(0.755)

10(21.7)

 Others

2(9.5)

1(4.0)

0.571(0.585)

3(6.5)

  1. aMultiple response allowed; HMIS refers to Health management information system