Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: The effect of community-based programs on diabetes prevention in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

First author, year published

Country, Study location

No. of participants

Age (y), mean(SD)

Interventions

Methods & Follow-up duration

Outcomes

Sathish, 2017

India, Kerala state

1007

47 (7.5)

Intervention arm received;

-Eleven peer led small group sessions

-Two diabetes prevention education sessions

-Participant handbook and workbook

-Health education booklet

Control arm received only health education booklet

Cluster randomized controlled trial Maximum follow-up: 24 months

Incidence of diabetes

Tran, 2017

Vietnam, Hanam province, 10 communes

417

57 (5)

Intervention group received: four components 1-four educational session 2- an information booklet 3- a resistance band 4- a walking group with a leader. Control group was on the waiting list to receive the intervention after completion of the post-test data collection.

Cluster randomized controlled trial Maximum follow-up: 6 months

Anthropometric indices, glycemic control, Blood pressure

Hu Zhao, 2017

China, Hunan Province, 42 villages of Yiyang City

434

69.3 (6.5)

Intervention Group were given an intense synthetic intervention: The synthetic intervention model included lifestyle education, lifestyle intervention, training for the self-monitoring of blood glucose and setting up a Help Each Other Group (HEOG). Control group were given standard primary care.

Cluster randomized controlled trial Maximum follow-up: 12 months

Incidence of diabetes, blood pressure, anthropometric indices, glycemic control

Limaye, 2016

India, Pune, two multinational IT industries

265

36 (9)

Intervention group received LIMIT program (LIfestyle Modification in IT); mobile phone and e-mail (virtual assistance)-based lifestyle intervention using combination of messages and emails to promote healthy lifestyle behaviours. Control group received no educational program.

Individuals randomized controlled trial Maximum follow-up: 12 months

Blood pressure, anthropometric indices, glycemic control

Ramachandran, 2013

India, 10 sites in southeast India

537

46 (4.7)

Intervention group: individually tailored mobile phone messaging including personalized education and motivation about healthy lifestyle principles, diet and physical activity. Control group: standard lifestyle modification advice at baseline

Individuals randomized controlled trial Maximum follow-up: 24 months

Incidence of diabetes, blood pressure, anthropometric indices

Pimentel, 2010

Brazil, Lins city in southeast Brazil

67

56 (12)

Intervention group received the dietary intervention consisted of discussion-format group sessions twice per month and individual sessions once per month to improve healthy behaviours. Control group received no program

Individuals randomized controlled trial Maximum follow-up: 12 months

Anthropometric indices, glycemic control