Skip to main content

Table 2 Types of study designs and study settings, stratified by student versus professional and by local versus international sponsor

From: Map of biomedical research in Cameroon; a documentary review of approved protocols from 1997 to 2012

Study Design stratified by student versus professional investigators

 

Students (%)

Professional (%)

P-value

Cross sectional

820 (56.4)

328 (45.7)

<0.001

Longitudinal

256 (17.6)

272 (37.9)

<0.001

Case control

71 (4.9)

29 (4.0)

0.36

Cohort

298 (20.5)

77 (10.7)

<0.001

Case series

4 (0.3)

4 (0.6)

0.31

Ecological studies

2 (0.2)

8 (1.2)

<0.001

Others

3 (0.2)

0

0.24

Total

1454

718

 

Study Design stratified by local sponsors versus international sponsors

 

Local sponsor (%)

International (%)

 

Cross sectional

844 (55.1)

109 (37.3)

<0.001

Longitudinal

320 (20.9)

135 (46.2)

<0.001

Case control

68 (4.4)

14 (4.8)

0.76

Cohort

285 (18.6)

31 (10.6)

<0.001

Case series

8 (0.5)

0

0.23

Ecological studies

5 (0.3)

3 (1.0)

0.09

Others

1 (0.1)

0

0.59

Total

1531

292

 

Study Settings stratified by students versus professional

 

Students (%)

Professional (%)

 

Laboratory

84 (6.1)

99 (13.5)

<0.001

Hospital

1104 (80.2)

424 (57.8)

<0.001

Community

126 (9.2)

176 (24.0)

<0.001

Other

63 (4.6)

35 (4.8)

0.84

Total

1377

734

 

Study Settings stratified by local sponsor versus international sponsor

 

Local Sponsor (%)

International (%)

 

Laboratory

128 (8.0)

43 (13.7)

<0.001

Hospital

1196 (75.0)

178 (56.5)

<0.001

Community

198 (12.4)

77 (24.4)

<0.001

Other

72 (4.5)

17 (5.4)

0.49

Total

1594

315

 

Result Dissemination Plan

Have a result dissemination plan

Local Sponsors

International Sponsors

p-value

Yes

137(7.6)

107 (29.0)

<0.001

No

1666 (92.4)

262 (71.0)

Total

1803

369

  1. P-value <0.01: strong evidence; <0.05: good evidence