Skip to main content

Table 1 Applying the Reverse Innovation Criteria: Uganda Health Information Network (UHIN)

From: Criteria to assess potential reverse innovations: opportunities for shared learning between high- and low-income countries

Brief description of initiative: An information network for community health workers using low-cost PDAs and cellular networks to collect and share critical health data

Step 1

   

Criteria

Description

Score

Rationale

 1. Accessibility

Innovation increases access of products or services through increasing affordability, geographic access, and/or social access.

4

The program provides community health workers with PDAs that automatically load public health data to a centralized data bank. This helps with disease surveillance to ensure the right medicines and services are directed where needed.

 2. Cost Effectiveness

Innovation improves cost effectiveness to payer, provider, or end user.

5

A study by independent consultants reported a savings of 25% per unit compared to traditional manual paper data collection.

 3. Scalability

Innovation increases scope, geographic cover, or customer base.

4

There are 700 health workers in the program. There are 175 remote health facilities in the country that now have PDA capability, serving 1.5 million people.

 4. Effectiveness

Documentation of effectiveness of innovation using appropriate evaluative methods

3

The cost-effectiveness of the program has been evaluated by independent consultants. The program is currently evaluating its health impact on healthcare planning, resource allocation, and delivery.

 

TOTAL SCORE

16

Conclusion: Move to Step 2

Step 2

   

Criteria

Description

Score

Rationale

 5. Gap in Target HIC

Creating solutions for unsolved (or imperfectly solved) challenges or unaddressed health issues or service gaps.

5

Information integration and digitalization, with particular attention to cost control, are extremely important challenges for the Canadian health system.

 6. Compatibility

Compatible with healthcare infrastructure in the target HIC.

3

It is unclear how this information system would be regulated in the Canadian context, particularly with privacy considerations. However, the system could likely be adapted to meet Canadian regulations.

 7. Novelty

The innovation is a novel approach or an established innovation used in a new way that has great promise.

4

PDAs and smartphones remain a relatively innovative, uncommon tool for health data collection in Canada.

 8. Receptivity

Openness and engagement of partners as well as those not considered partners but who may be impacted by the innovation.

4

The IDRC and former CIDA are the primary funders of this initiative, suggesting strong connections to Canada.

 

TOTAL SCORE

16

Conclusion: Score is ≥16. Likely to be a reverse innovation.