From: Strategies for utilisation management of hospital services: a systematic review of interventions
Author (Year) Country | Type of intervention | Main Outcome Measure | Outcomes | Statistically significant (P < .05) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | Intervention | ||||||||
Before | After | Difference | Before | After | Difference | ||||
Sandberg et al. [66] (2015) Sweden | Case management | No. of admissions, mean | 0.62 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.49 | No | ||
LOS, mean | 3.90 | 4.05 | 5.05 | 4.60 | No | ||||
No. of ED visits leading to hospitalization, mean | 0.36 | 0.42 | 0.39 | 0.34 | No | ||||
No. of ED visits not leading to hospitalization, mean | 0.22 | 0.37 | 0.15 | 0.08 | Yes | ||||
Proportion of ED visits not leading to hospitalisation | 16 (38.1%) | 23 (46.7%) | 12 (27.9%) | 4 (17.4%) | Yes | ||||
No. of outpatient visits, mean | 6.10 | 5.29 | 5.30 | 4.09 | Yes | ||||
Haldiman et al. [40] (2014) the United States | Prospective review | No. of FFPs transfused per 1000 patients discharged per year | – | – | – | Y1: 66.7 | Y4: 46.9 | - 19.8 (−29.7%) | Yes |
No. of platelets transfused per1000 patient discharged per year | – | – | – | Y1: 23.7 | Y2: 18.7 | -5 (−21.1%) | Yes | ||
Annual cost savings | $130,000,000 | NR | |||||||
Goodnough et al. [37] (2014) the United States | Concurrent review | % of blood transfusions in patients whit HB levels exceeded 8 g/dl | – | – | – | 57% | 30% | Yes | |
Total RBC transfusions | – | – | – | – | − 7186 (−24%) | NR | |||
Total plasma transfusions | – | – | – | – | – | −10% | NR | ||
Total platelets transfusions | – | – | – | – | – | −12% | NR | ||
All blood components | – | – | – | – | – | −19% | NR | ||
Net savings | $1,616,750 | NR | |||||||
Joo [46] (2014) the United States | Case management | No. of Admissions | – | – | – | Y1: 0.62 | Y2: 0.47 | Yes | |
Total LOS | – | – | – | Y1: 3.05 | Y2: 2.28 | No | |||
NO. of ED visits | – | – | – | Y1: 0.38 | Y2: 0.36 | No | |||
Symptom control | – | – | – | B: 4.07 Y1: 4.19 | Y2: 4.27 | Yes | |||
Quality of life | – | – | – | B: 3.89 Y1: 4.01 | Y2: 4.03 | Yes | |||
Personal well-being | – | – | – | B: 4.09 Y1: 4.13 | Y2: 4.14 | No | |||
Buckley et al. [24] (2013) the United States | Drug-utilisation management program | The proportion of patients prescribed epoetin | – | – | – | 2.4% | 1.6% | Yes | |
No. of patients inappropriately prescribed epoetin | – | – | – | 184/496 (37.1%) | 37/300 (12.3%) | Yes | |||
Total no. of epoetin units administered | – | 24,531,340 | 13,511,800 | −45% | Yes | ||||
Total epoetin costs | – | – | – | $220,786 ($36,797/mo) | $121,606 ($20,268/mo) | −45% | Yes | ||
% of total costs was attributed to inappropriate epoetin prescribing | – | – | – | 36.8% | 13% | Yes | |||
Annual cost savings | $ 198,352 ($ 16,529/mo) | Yes | |||||||
Reinius et al. [62] (2013) Sweden | Case management | No. of ED visits | – | 6.4 | – | – | 4.9 | – | RRs 0.77; 95% CI 0.69-0.87 |
No. of admissions, mean | – | 2.1 | – | – | 1.7 | – | No | ||
No. of hospital days per patient per year | – | 16.9 | – | – | 7.0 | −58% | Yes | ||
No. of out-patient visits, mean | – | 25.4 | – | – | 21.4 | −15.7% | RRs 0.85; 95% CI 0.79–0.90 | ||
Costs per patient per year | – | €26,490 | – | – | €11,417 | −57% | Yes | ||
Quality-of-life scores | – | – | – | – | – | – | Yes | ||
Crane et al. [30] (2012) the United States | Case management | No. of ED visits, median | 6.96 | 5.04 | −1.92 | 6.96 | 2.76 | −4.2 | Yes |
Total ED and inpatient charges per patient per mon, mean | – | – | – | $1167 | $230 | -$937 | Yes | ||
Roland et al. [64] (2012) the United Kingdom | Case management | No. of emergency admissions | – | – | – | – | – | + 9% | Yes |
No. of elective admissions | – | – | – | – | – | −21% | Yes | ||
No. of out-patient visits | – | – | – | – | – | −22% | Yes | ||
Inpatient and out-patient costs | – | – | – | – | – | -£223 −9% | Yes | ||
Koehler et al. [49] (2009) the United States | Care coordination | No. of 0-30 day post-discharge readmissions/ ED visits | – | 8 (38%) | – | – | 2 (10%) | Yes | |
No. of 31-60 day post-discharge readmissions/ED visits | – | 1 (4.8%) | – | – | 4 (20%) | No | |||
Total post-discharge readmissions/ED visits at 60 days | – | 9 (42.9%) | – | – | 6 (30%) | No | |||
Schraeder et al. [67] (2008) the United States | Case management | Admissions, % | – | 53.8 | – | – | 51 | – | No |
Hospital bed days, mean | – | 13.89 | – | – | 8.19 | – | Yes | ||
ED visits, mean | – | 1.79 | – | – | 1.48 | – | No | ||
Readmissions | – | 28.8% | – | – | 19.2% | −34% | Yes | ||
Cost of care per patient per mon, mean | – | $708 | – | – | $1193 | -$485 | Yes | ||
Adjusted cost of care per patient per mon (cost savings) | – | – | – | – | – | $106 | No | ||
Holsinger et al. [42] (2008) the United States | Collaborative model | 1-day hospital stays | – | – | – | – | – | −19% | NR |
Sweeney et al. [77] (2007) the United States | Patient-centred management | No. of admission, mean | – | 1.9 | – | – | 1.2 | −36.8% | Yes |
Hospital days, mean | – | 13.4 | – | – | 8.5 | −36.6% | Yes | ||
No. of ED visits, mean | – | 1.5 | – | – | 1.0 | −33.3% | No | ||
Rehabilitation days, mean | – | 5.8 | – | – | 3.7 | −36.2% | No | ||
Hospice days, mean | – | 2.4 | – | – | 3.3 | 37.5% | No | ||
Home care days, mean | – | 30.9 | – | – | 36.8 | 26.6% | No | ||
The overall cost per patient for 18 mon, mean | – | $ 68,341 | – | – | $ 49,742 | $ -18,599 (−27.2%) | NR | ||
Phillips et al. [59] (2006) Australia | Case management | Admissions, sum of the percentage | – | – | – | 1104 | 931 | No | |
No. of ED visits, mean | – | – | – | 10.2 | 13.0 | + 2.8 (27.4%) | No P = 0.55 | ||
ED LOS, minutes, mean | – | – | – | 297 | 300 | + 3 | No | ||
No. of ED overnight observation, mean | – | – | – | 1.3 | 3.4 | + 2.1 (166%) | Yes | ||
Housing stability score | – | – | – | 3.6 | 4.1 | 0.5 (14%) | Yes | ||
Primary care engagement score | – | – | – | 2.6 | 3.1 | 0.5 (19%) | Yes | ||
Community care engagement score | – | – | – | 2.1 | 3.2 | 1.1 (52%) | Yes | ||
Drug and alcohol use | – | – | – | 68.3% | 58.9% | No | |||
Sledge et al. [73] (2006) the United States | Case management | No. of admissions, mean | 2.0 | 1.7 | −0.3 | 1.9 | 1.3 | −0.6 | No |
No. of ED visits, mean | 3.3 | 2.7 | −0.6 | 2.0 | 1.5 | −0.5 | No | ||
No. of clinic visits, mean | 5.9 | 5.7 | −0.2 | 6.4 | 7.9 | + 1.5 | Yes | ||
Total cost, mean | $17,721 | $15,447 | -$2274 | $17,265 | $16,291 | -$974 | No | ||
SF-36 Mental Health Function Score | 21.7 | 22 | 0.3 | 21.3 | 21.4 | 0.1 | No | ||
Overall patient satisfaction | 7.24 | 6.7 | −0.54 | 7.47 | 7.6 | 0.13 | No | ||
Mahendran et al. [54] (2006) Singapore | Case management | No. of readmissions | – | – | – | 65 | 26 | −39 | Yes |
No. of patients who defaulted follow-up appointments | – | – | – | All outpatient: 24% | CM patient: 11.9% | Yes | |||
No. of days per admission, mean | – | – | – | 15.6 | 4 | −11.6 | Yes | ||
Zemencuk et al. [85] (2006) the United States | Physician profiling | LOS | – | – | – | – | – | − 0.32 day | Yes |
Latour et al. [52] (2006) the Netherlands | Case management | Readmission rate | – | 11 (15.9%) | – | – | 16 (20.6%) | – | No |
Quality of life | – | – | – | – | – | – | No | ||
Psychological functioning | – | – | – | – | – | – | No | ||
Hegney et al. [41] (2006) Australia | Discharge planning using risk screening tool | ED revisitation rate | – | – | – | 21% | 5% | −16% | Yes |
Readmission rate | – | – | – | 9 (10.2%) | 7 (4.7%) | −2 (5.5%) | No | ||
ALOS | – | – | – | 6.17 | 5.37 | −0.8 | NR | ||
Horwitz et al. [43] (2005) the United States | Case management | No. of admission | – | 7/109 (6.4%) | – | – | 3/121 (2.5%) | No | |
No. of ED visits | – | 32/109 (29.4%) | – | – | 38/121 (31.4%) | No | |||
Primary care contact in 60 days | – | 15/109 (13.8%) | – | – | 62/121 (51.2%) | Yes | |||
Cost of an ED visit, mean | $330 | $319 | $330 | $243 | NR | ||||
Leung et al. [53] (2004) China | Case management | Total no. of admissions, mean | 1.4 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 2.3 | Yes | ||
Total no. of hospital bed days, mean | 6.8 | 10.7 | 12.9 | 9.6 | Yes | ||||
Total no. of visits, mean | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.3 | No | ||||
Total no. of outpatient visits, mean | 6.7 | 6.9 | 9.0 | 8.3 | Yes | ||||
Cox et al. (2003) [29] the United States | Case management | No. of admissions, mean | – | – | – | 3.11 | 0.82 | −2.29 | Yes |
Hospital days, mean | – | – | – | 46.6 | 12.4 | −34.2 | Yes | ||
Cost-saving per inpatient day | – | – | – | – | – | $ 166 | Yes | ||
Hwang et al. [44] (2002) Korea | Physician’s order entry system | LOS, mean | – | – | – | 11.4 | 8.2 | −3.2 | Yes |
No. of daily orders | – | – | – | 10.9 | 18.9 | + 8 | Yes | ||
No. of stat lab tests | – | – | – | 3.3 | 1.8 | −1.5 | Yes | ||
Fateha [34] (2002) Bahrain | Concurrent Review | LOS, mean | – | – | – | 8.3 | 6.6 | −1.7 (−20.5%) | Yes |
Ferrazzi et al. [35] (2001) Canada | Advanced life support drug treatment given by ambulance attendants | Proportion of admissions | – | – | – | 145 (67.4%) | 102 (54.3%) | Yes | |
ED LOS, min, mean | – | – | - | 206.9 | 220.9 | −14 | No | ||
Ambulance scene time, min | – | – | – | 12.3 | 14.2 | Yes | |||
Okin et al. [57] (2000) the United States | Case management | No. of ED visits, median | – | – | – | 15 | 9 | −6 (−40%) | Yes |
No. of out-patient visits, median | – | – | – | 2 | 4 | Yes | |||
No. of admissions, median | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | No | |||
Medical inpatient days, median | – | – | – | 5 | 2 | No | |||
ED costs, median | – | – | – | $4124 | $2195 | $-1938 | Yes | ||
Medical inpatient costs, median | – | – | – | $8330 | $2786 | $-1082 | Yes | ||
Medical out-patient costs, median | – | – | – | $476 | $612 | $94 | No | ||
Homelessness | – | – | – | 35 | 15 | −20 (−57%) | Yes | ||
Alcohol use | – | – | – | 37 | 29 | −8 (−22%) | Yes | ||
Drug use | – | – | – | 27 | 20 | −7 (−26%) | Yes | ||
Linkage to primary care | – | – | – | – | – | + 74% | Yes | ||
Net cost savings | $132,726 | NR | |||||||
Bates et al. [22] (1999) the United States | Computerised physician order entry | No. of clinical laboratory orders that were cancelled in response to reminders | – | Not applicable | – | – | 300 of 437 (69%) | – | Yes |
The proportion of the redundant tests that were performed | – | 257 (51%) | – | – | 117 (27%) | – | Yes | ||
Annual lab cost savings | $35,000 | NR | |||||||
Wickizer et al. [82] (1998) the United States | Utilisation management strategies | No. of days approved | – | – | – | – | – | −50% | Yes |
Spillane et al. [74] (1997) the United States | Case management | No. of ED visits, median | 13 | 6 | −7 | 14 | 7 | −7 | NO |
Bree et al. [23] (1996) the United States | Pre-certification | No. of examinations per admission, mean | – | 4.4 | – | – | 4.4 | – | No |
LOS, mean | – | 6.1 | – | – | 6.0 | – | No | ||
% of patients with one or more tests | – | 88.7% | – | – | 88% | – | No | ||
Relative value units (RVUs), mean. | – | 336.0 | – | – | 356.1 | – | No | ||
Adjusted RVUs | – | −10.2 | – | – | −8.8 | – | No | ||
Shea et al. [69] (1995) the United States | Clinical information system | Adjusted LOS, mean | – | 0.012 | – | – | −0.011 | −2.3% | Yes |
Cardiff et al. [26] (1995) Canada | Utilisation management | Inappropriate admissions | C: 26 (18%) D: 36 (23%) | C: 18 (13%) D: 48 (30%) | – | A: 71 (24%) B: 78 (26%) | A: 88 (29%) B: 68 (23%) | – | Among hospitals in both time period: Yes |
Adjusted inappropriate continued days of stay | C: 0.0656 D: 0.0617 | C: 0.0665 D: 0.0906 | – | A: 0.1597 B: 0.1224 | A: 0.0770 B: 0.0918 | – | B: Yes A,C,D: No | ||
30-day readmission (rate per 1000 discharge) | C: 105 D: 92 | C: 96 D: 76 | – | A: 83 B: 73 | A: 71 B: 60 | – | A,B,D: Yes C:No | ||
Styrborn [76] (1995) Sweden | Discharge planning | Adjusted LOS | – | B: 10.5 C: 10.9 | – | – | A: 9.6 | A-(B + C): −1.1 | No |
No. of bed-blocking patients | – | B: 35 C: 35 | – | – | A: 31 | −4 | NR | ||
Waiting days/patient | – | B: 11.3 C: 18.0 | – | – | A: 8.2 | A-(B + C): −6.4 | Yes | ||
Charge days per patient | – | B: 6.2 C: 13.4 | – | – | A: 4.2 | A-(B + C): −5.6 | Yes | ||
Rosenberg et al. [65] (1995) the United States | Utilisation review, second opinion, discharge planning, case management | No. of out-patient procedure | – | 913 | – | – | 789 | −124 | Yes |
No. of inpatient procedure | – | 452 | – | – | 466 | 14 | No | ||
No. of admission per 1000 patients | 625.4 | 641.8 | 16.4 | No | |||||
Adjusted LOS | – | 5.9 | – | – | 6.1 | 0.2 | No | ||
Adjusted ALOS, mean | – | 5.8 | – | – | 6.1 | 0.3 | No | ||
Jambunathan et al. [45] (1995) the United States | Case management | No. of case management visits/Adjusted LOS (r-value) | – | – | – | – | .6138 | – | Yes |
Williams et al. [83] (1994) Australia | Drug utilisation review | No. of patients using benzodiazepines | – | – | – | 30 (40%) | 15 (20%) | −15 (−20%) | Yes |
No. of patients using potentially adverse side-effects drug combinations (%) | – | – | – | 21 (28%) | 7 (9.3%) | −14 (− 18.7%) | Yes | ||
Wickizer [81] (1992) the United States | Utilisation review | No. of admissions | – | – | – | – | – | −12% | Yes |
Adjusted LOS | – | – | – | – | – | – | No | ||
Hospital routine costs | – | – | – | – | – | −8% | Yes | ||
Hospital ancillary costs | – | – | – | – | – | −9% | Yes | ||
Total medical cost | – | – | – | – | – | − 6% | Yes | ||
Cost savings per employee per year | $115 | NR | |||||||
Woodside et al. [84] (1991) the United States | Utilisation management strategies | Adjusted LOS | – | 11.8 | – | – | 9.1 | −23% | NR |
Total costs, mean | – | $22,695 | – | – | $19,042 | −16% | NR | ||
Silver et al. [71] (1992) the United States | Prospective review | No. of orders cancelled | – | – | – | – | 114 (21%) | – | NR |
Medical costs | – | – | – | – | – | -$22,000 | NR | ||
Fowkes et al. [36] (1986) the United Kingdom | Utilisation review | No. of X-ray tests per100 operations | – | – | – | 29.4 | 13.3 | −16.1 | Yes |
Echols et al. [32] (1984) the United States | Drug utilisation review | No. of antibiotic treatment courses | – | – | – | – | – | −30% | Yes |
No. of patients receiving any antibiotic | – | – | – | 47% | 30% | −17% | Yes | ||
Restuccia [63] (1982) the United States | Utilisation review | No. of inappropriate days, mean | – | D: 3.25 | – | – | A: 2.59 B: 2.75 C: 3.25 | A-D: −0.66 B-D: −0.5 C-D: 0 | Yes |
Adjusted LOS, mean | – | D: 14.59 | – | – | A: 12.23 B: 13.81 C: 15.23 | A-D: −2.36 B-D: −0.78 C-D: 0.64 | Yes | ||
Murphy [56] (2014) the United States | Case management | No. of ED visits | – | – | – | 7 | 2 | −5 | Yes |
No. of out-patient visits | – | – | – | 7 | 2 | −5 | Yes | ||
Direct treatment costs | – | – | – | $2328 | $1043 | -$1285 | Yes | ||
Direct treatment cost per visit | – | – | – | $323 | $235 | -$88 | Yes | ||
Net income | – | – | – | -$608 | -$177 | $431 | Yes | ||
Chiang et al. [27] (2014) Taiwan | Case management | No. of ED visits, mean | – | – | – | 63 | 26 | −37 (−58%) | Yes |
Pillow et al. [60] (2013) the United States | Care plans | No. of ED visits per year per patient | – | – | – | 22.6 | 21.2 | −1.4 | Yes |
No. of admissions per year per patient | – | – | – | 7.3 | 6.8 | −0.5 | No | ||
Dehaven et al. [31] (2012) the United States | Community-based partnership | No. of ED visits, mean | – | 1.44 | – | – | 0.93 | – | Yes |
No. of hospital days, mean | – | 1.07 | – | – | 0.37 | – | Yes | ||
Direct hospital costs, mean | – | $1188 | – | – | $445.6 | −62% | Yes | ||
Indirect costs, mean | – | $692.1 | – | – | $313.3 | −55% | Yes | ||
Tadros et al. [78] (2012) the United States | Case management | No. of EMS visits, median | – | – | – | 8 | 4 | −4 | Yes |
Total no. of EMS visits | – | – | – | 736 | 459 | −37.6% | Yes | ||
No. of ED visits, median | – | – | – | 1 | 0 | −1 | No | ||
Total no. of ED visits | – | – | – | 199 | 143 | −28.1% | No | ||
No. of admissions, median | – | – | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | ||
Total no. of admissions | – | – | – | 33 | 30 | −9.1% | No | ||
LOS, median | – | – | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | ||
LOS, days | – | – | – | 122 | 88 | −27.9% | No | ||
EMS costs | – | – | – | $689,743 | $468,394 | −32.1% | Yes | ||
Out-patient costs | – | – | – | $413,410 | $360,779 | −12.7 | No | ||
Inpatient costs | – | – | – | $687,306 | $646,881 | −5.9% | No | ||
Total costs | – | – | – | $1,790,459 | $1,476,053 | -$314,406 (−17.6%) | NR | ||
Shah et al. [68] (2011) the United States | Care management | No. of ED visits per year, median | – | – | – | 6.0 | 1.7 | −3.9 | Yes |
No. of admissions, median | – | – | – | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | No | ||
Unadjusted ED cost per patient per year, mean | – | – | – | $2545 | $1874 | -$671 (−26%) | Yes | ||
Unadjusted admission cost per patient per year, mean | – | – | – | $ 20,298 | $ 7053 | -$ 13,245 (−65%) | Yes | ||
Stokes-Buzzelli S et al. [75] (2010) the United States | Health Information Technologies | No. of ED visits, mean | – | – | – | 67.4 | 50.5 | −16.9 (−%25) | Yes |
ED LOS, min | – | – | – | 388 | 342 | −46 (−%12) | No | ||
Lab studies ordered, mean | – | – | – | 1847 | 1328 | −519 (−%28) | Yes | ||
ED charges | – | – | – | $64,721 | $49,208 | −15,513 (−24%) | Yes | ||
Total Emergency Department Contact Time, hours | – | – | – | 443.7 | 270.6 | − 173.1 or 7.21 days (−39%) | Yes | ||
Grimmer- Somers et al. [38] (2010) Australia | Individualised care plan | No. of ED visits | – | – | – | 0.81 | 0.59 | NR | |
No. of admissions | – | – | – | 0.32 | 0.21 | NR | |||
LOS | – | – | – | – | – | −1.3 | NR | ||
Grover et al. [39] (2010) the United States | Case management | No. of ED visits, mean | – | – | – | 13.8 | 3.6 | −74% | Yes |
No. of CT images | – | – | – | 153.6 | 61.2 | −60% | Yes | ||
Skinner et al. [72] (2009) the United Kingdom | Case management | No. of ED visits, median | – | – | – | 12 | 6 | −6 | Yes |
Total no. of ED visits | – | – | – | 720 | 499 | − 221 (−31%) | Yes | ||
Shumway et al. [70] (2008) the United States | Case management | No. of ED visits, mean | 5.2 | 2.0 | 3.6 | 0.9 | Yes | ||
No. of admissions, mean | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | No | ||||
Medical inpatient days, mean | 3.4 | 1.7 | 3.4 | 1.3 | No | ||||
No. of outpatient visits, mean | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.2 | No | ||||
ED costs, mean | 942 | 647 | 790 | 247 | Yes | ||||
All hospital costs, mean | 8423 | 3849 | 8508 | 4761 | No | ||||
Homeless, n (%) | 32 (80) | 11 (33) | 61 (76) | 22 (32) | Yes | ||||
Problem alcohol use, n (%) | 21 (53) | 12 (30) | 38 (48) | 22 (28) | Yes | ||||
No. of health insurance (%) | 31 (78) | 17 (53) | 59 (75) | 30 (44) | Yes | ||||
No. of social security income (%) | 29 (74) | 18 (58) | 63 (79) | 26 (43) | Yes | ||||
Basic financial needs, mean | 4.4 | 3.7 | 5.2 | 3.8 | Yes | ||||
Psychiatric symptoms (total BSI score), mean | 10.0 | 9.8 | 11.6 | 10.4 | No | ||||
Pope et al. [61] (2000) Canada | Case management | No. of number of ED visits, median | – | – | – | 26.5 | 6.5 | −20 | Yes |
Total no. of ED visits | – | – | – | 616 | 175 | − 441 (−72%) | Yes | ||
Moher et al. [55] (1992) Canada | Discharge planning | LOS, mean | – | 9.4 | – | – | 7.43 | −1.97 | Yes |
Readmission rate at 2 weeks | – | 18 (14%) | – | – | 22 (16%) | No | |||
Kennedy et al. [47] (1987) the United States | Discharge planning | LOS, mean | – | 9.7 | – | – | 7.8 | −1.9 | Yes |
Readmission rate at 8 weeks | – | 14 (34%) | – | – | 11 (28%) | −6% | NR | ||
Kurant et al .[51] (2018) the United States | Laboratory-based utilisation management programs | ||||||||
Copeland et al. [28] (2017) the United States | Modelling | Total imaging per patient | – | – | – | – | – | – | RRs 1.93; 95% CI 1.67–2.23 |
Pena et al .[58] (2014) the United States | Blood management program, benchmarking | Total RBC transfusions | – | – | – | 37,167 | 34,602 | Yes | |
Total plasma transfusions | – | – | – | – | 10,544 | NR | |||
Total platelets transfusions | – | – | – | 8202 | 7844 | NR | |||
Total albumin transfusions | – | – | – | 23,949 | 24,557 | NR | |||
Total IVIg transfusions | – | – | – | 52,085 | 44,973 | ||||
Weilburg et al. [80] (2017) the United States | Analysis of high-cost imaging utilisation | No. of high-cost imaging per year | – | – | – | 0.43 examinations | 0.34 examinations | - 21.3% | Yes |
Overall laboratory utilisation | – | – | – | – | – | −9.4% | Yes | ||
Inpatient stays | – | – | – | 0.453 | 0.422 | No | |||
No. of departments visited | – | – | – | 0.558 | 0.823 | Yes | |||
Konger et al. [50] (2016) the United States | Reductions in unnecessary clinical laboratory testing | Total test volume per year | – | – | – | – | – | −11.18% | Yes |
El-Othmani et al. [33] (2019) the United States | Joint utilisation management program | LOS | 9.27 | 6.2 | 4.22 | 3.04 | |||
The rate of 30 day readmission | 21.05 | 23.50 | 9.94 | 8.0 | |||||
Inpatient rehabilitation | 15.79 | 5.88 | 5.9 | 3.08 | |||||
Kim & Lee [48] (2020) Korea | Case Management | Inpatient days | 30.5 | 10.6 | |||||
Outpatient visits | 128.3 | 104.7 | |||||||
Self-care ability | 15.41 | 18.64 | |||||||
Wasfy et al. [79] (2019) the United States | Hospital Readmissions reduction Program | In-patient readmission | 0.023 | 0.002 | yes | ||||
Treat-and-discharge visit to emergency department | 0.014 | 0.029 | yes | ||||||
Observation stay (not leading to inpatient readmission) | 0.019 | 0.024 | yes | ||||||
Calsolaro et al. [25] (2019) | Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program | Potentially preventable read-missions (PPR) | |||||||
LOS (median and range) | 5 (4-6) | 6 (2-14) |