Skip to main content

Table 3 Ordinal regression models

From: Pandemic preparedness systems and diverging COVID-19 responses within similar public health regimes: a comparative study of expert perceptions of pandemic response in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden

 

Model 1, [95% CI]

Model 2, [95% CI]

Main exogeneous variable

 Focused Protection

1.646*** [.9594258,2.332713]

3.035*** [.9541268,5.115762]

Country

 Denmark

.99** [.0745461,1.904537]

1.3** [.2262297,2.373463]

 Sweden

−3.837*** [−4.982998,-2.690282]

− 3.653*** [− 4.833754,-2.472516]

Locational factors

 National public health institution

.328 [−.5178161,1.173866]

.379 [−.4718739,1.229217]

 Seniority (management)

−.442 [−1.514791,.6311714]

−.385 [− 1.461717,.6923323]

 Seniority (other)

−.701 [− 1.967297,.5651666]

−.711 [− 1.971304,.5500428]

 Advised national government

.123 [−.4913383,.7370525]

.125 [−.488994,.7399688]

Disciplinary factors

 Discipline (ECON)

−.147 [−1.08057,.7863736]

−.127 [− 1.058946,.805931]

 Discipline (LAB)

.59 [−.3414026,1.520423]

.586 [−.3430957,1.515832]

 Discipline (PHEBS)

−.318 [−1.102371,.4665183]

−.346 [− 1.136617,.4455106]

Demographic factors

 Female

.425 [−.3013709,1.151985]

457 [−.272152,1.186631]

 Age

.001 [−.0279029,.0298005]

0 [−.0286958,.0292863]

Geography factors

 Metropolis

−.36 [−1.035637,.3155528]

−.338 [− 1.015873,.3406098]

Sampling factors

 Expert list

−.348 [−1.102565,.4065451]

−.307 [− 1.062406,.448224]

Interactions

 Denmark*focused protection

 

−1.554 [−3.810335,.7018508]

 Sweden*focused protection

 

−1.532 [−3.843457,.7792814]

 /cut1

−2.923*** [−4.983256,-.8628515]

− 2.774*** [− 4.849076,-.6995892]

 /cut2

2.044** [.0773675,4.010873]

2.315** [.2755515,4.353492]

 Observations

232

232

*** p < .01, ** p < .05, * p < .1