Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of survey population

From: Pandemic preparedness systems and diverging COVID-19 responses within similar public health regimes: a comparative study of expert perceptions of pandemic response in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden

Saving lives (main dependent variable)

 

 Underreaction

64 (27%)

 Neither underreaction nor overreaction

129 (56%)

 Overreaction

39 (17%)

Dominant Ideas (main independent variable)

 Supporting focused protection, N Experts (%)

  No (baseline)

175 (75%)

  Yes

57 (25%)

National Factors

 Country, N Experts (%)

  Norway (baseline)

53 (23%)

  Denmark

88 (38%)

  Sweden

91 (39%)

Locational Factors

 

 National Public health institution, N Experts (%)

  No (baseline)

183 (79%)

  Yes

49 (21%)

 Seniority, N Experts (%)

  Senior (Full professorship or Chief Physician) (baseline)

132 (57%)

  Management

22 (9%)

  Other (less than senior or management, eg. associate/assistant professor, MD)

78 (34%)

 Advised National Government, N Experts (%)

  No (baseline)

113 (49%)

  Yes

119 (51%)

Disciplinary factors, N Experts (%)

 Medicine (baseline)

109 (47%)

 Public Health

57 (25%)

 Economics

36 (15%)

 Lab

30 (13%)

Demographic and geographic factors

 Gender, N Experts (%)

  Male (baseline)

169 (73%)

  Female

63 (27%)

 Age, Year, mean ± SD (range)

  Age

57 ± 11 (46–68)

 Metropolitan regions, N Experts (%)

  No (baseline)

69 (30%)

  Yes

163 (70%)

Sampling factors

 On expert list, N Experts (%)

  No (baseline)

173 (75%)

  Yes

59 (25%)