Skip to main content

Table 1 Number of publications on each SDG (2015–2019)

From: Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on “sustainable development goals” with emphasis on “good health and well-being” goal (2015–2019)

SDG Goal

Number of documents

%

N = 18,696

Number of citations per document

Top five countries

1: No Poverty

1401

7.5

9.5

US, UK, South Africa, Australia, Canada

2: Zero Hunger

655

3.5

11.6

US, UK, Australia, Netherlands, Germany

3: Good Health and Well-being

1477

7.9

14.3

US, UK, Switzerland, Australia, Canada

4: Quality Education

685

3.7

5.1

UK, US, Australia, Germany, Canada

5: Gender Equality

403

2.2

11.0

US, UK, South Africa, Switzerland, Canada

6: Clean Water and Sanitation

781

4.2

10.5

US, UK, China, Netherland, Germany

7: Affordable and Clean Energy

203

1.1

14.6

Australia, US, Germany, China, UK

8: Decent Work and Economic Growth

493

2.6

9.4

US, UK, Australia, Germany, South Africa

9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure

550

2.9

9.7

US, UK, Australia, Germany, South Africa

10: Reduced Inequality

257

1.4

6.7

US, UK, Australia, South Africa, Canada

11: Sustainable Cities and Communities

1316

7.0

10.4

UK, US, China, Australia, Germany

12: Responsible Consumption and Production

1764

9.4

13.4

US, UK, Germany, Australia, Italy

13: Climate Action

2699

14.4

13.5

US, UK, Australia, Germany, Netherlands

14: Life Below Water

652

3.5

10.0

US, UK, Australia, Canada, Germany

15: Life on Land

1499

8.0

12.3

US, UK, Germany, Australia, China

16: Peace and Justice Strong Institutions

486

2.6

9.4

US, UK, South Africa, Australia, Canada

17: Partnerships to achieve the Goal

3073

16.4

10.2

US, UK, Australia, Switzerland, Germany

Totala

18,375

98.4

 

US, UK, Australia, Germany, China

  1. aThe total was less than the overall number (n = 18,696) either because of the presence of limited number of false positive results or because the keywords used to retrieve the documents on each SDG were not 100% accurate. The difference, which is approximately 1.5%, will not affect the overall analysis