Study | 1. Priori design provided | 2. Duplicate study selection & data extraction | 3. Comprehensive literature search | 4. Status of publication an inclusion criteria | 5. List of studies provided (Included &Excluded) | 6. Characteristics of studies provided | 7. Scientific quality of studies assessed | 8. Scientific quality used appropriately in formulating conclusions | 9. Appropriate methods used to combine study findings | 10. Likelihood of publication bias assessed | 11. Conflict of interest included | Overall Quality rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Borque et al. [6] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | × | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | × | 8/11 (moderate) |
Das Munshi et al. [16] | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | × | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ | × | 6/11 (moderate) |
Nilaweera et al. [19] | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | × | ✓ | ✓ | × | × | × | × | 4/11 (low) |
Cantor Graee & Selten [8] | ✓ | × | × | × | × | ✓ | × | × | ✓ | × | × | 3/11 (low) |
Lindert et al. [9] | ✓ | × | × | × | × | ✓ | × | × | ✓ | × | × | 3/11 (low) |
Fazel et al. [17] | × | × | × | × | × | ✓ | × | × | ✓ | × | × | 2/11 (low) |
Bronstein and Montgomery [15] | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | × | × | × | 6/11 (moderate) |
Slewa-Youghan et al. [18] | × | ✓ | ✓ | × | × | ✓ | ✓ | × | × | × | × | 4/11 (low) |