Skip to main content

Table 9 Results of sufficiency analyses

From: Trade liberalization, social policies and health: an empirical case study

 

Adult female mortality

Infant mortality

Configuration

Cases

Health improving consistency

Health worsening consistency

Cases

Health improving consistency

Health worsening consistency

h*M*W*G*l

Brazil

0.975*

0.432

Brazil, Sri Lanka

0.486

0.993*

h*m*w*G*l

China, India, Thailand

0.426

0.702

China, India, Thailand

0.540

0.887*

h*M*w*G*l

Bangladesh

0.582

0.753*

Bangladesh, Indonesia

0.604

0.903*

h*M*W*g*L

Philippines, South Africa

0.705

0.693

Philippines, South Africa

0.642

0.560

h*M*w*g*L

Kyrgyz Republic, Peru

0.613

0.720

Azerbaijan, Kyrgyz Republic, Morocco, Peru

0.787*

0.523

h*M*W*g*l

Ecuador, Turkey

0.629

0.629

Ecuador, Turkey

0.881*

0.455

h*M*w*g*l

Colombia

0.681

0.676

Colombia, Egypt

0.933*

0.603

H*M*W*g*L

Bulgaria, Croatia, Latvia, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovak Republic

0.398

0.821*

Bulgaria, Croatia, Latvia, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic

0.469

0.660

H*m*W*g*L

Mexico

0.555

0.867*

Mexico

0.673

0.667

H*M*w*g*L

Estonia, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania

0.416

0.816*

Italy, Lithuania

0.685

0.606

H*m*w*g*L

Korea

0.578

0.894*

Korea

0.887*

0.492

H*M*w*g*l

Greece

0.745

0.532

Greece

0.954*

0.526

  1. Italicized countries represent deviant cases, they are members of the sufficient configuration but not of the outcome
  2. H highly developed; M protective labour market; W protective welfare state; G employment growth; L employment loss (lower case signifies the negation of these conditions)
  3. *Consistency greater than 0.75
Back to article page

Globalization and Health

ISSN: 1744-8603