From: Trade liberalization, social policies and health: an empirical case study
Country | Highly developed | Protective labour market polices | Protective welfare state policies | Employment growth | Employment loss | Improving AFM | Worsening AFM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Azerbaijan | 0.35 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.99 | NA | NA |
Bangladesh | 0.06 | 0.6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.99 |
Brazil | 0.48 | 0.6 | 0.67 | 0.89 | 0 | 0.94 | 0.06 |
Bulgaria | 0.62 | 1 | 0.67 | 0 | 0.98 | 0.09 | 0.91 |
China | 0.42 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.98 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
Colombia | 0.48 | 0.8 | 0 | 0 | 0.36 | 0.21 | 0.79 |
Croatia | 0.8 | 1 | 0.67 | 0 | 0.98 | 0 | 1 |
Ecuador | 0.41 | 1 | 0.67 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.75 | 0.25 |
Egypt | 0.27 | 1 | 0 | 0.02 | 0.11 | NA | NA |
Estonia | 0.85 | 1 | 0.33 | 0 | 1 | 0.04 | 0.96 |
Greece | 0.97 | 1 | 0.33 | 0.01 | 0.29 | 0.97 | 0.03 |
Hungary | 0.89 | 1 | 0.33 | 0 | 1 | 0.02 | 0.98 |
India | 0.13 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.99 | 0 | 0.05 | 0.95 |
Indonesia | 0.29 | 1 | 0 | 0.75 | 0 | NA | NA |
Italy | 0.99 | 1 | 0.33 | 0 | 0.92 | 0 | 1 |
Korea | 0.97 | 0.2 | 0.33 | 0 | 0.9 | 0.07 | 0.93 |
Kyrgyzstan | 0.28 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.99 |
Latvia | 0.79 | 0.8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.99 |
Lithuania | 0.85 | 1 | 0.33 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Mauritius | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.67 | 0 | 0.95 | 0.51 | 0.49 |
Mexico | 0.65 | 0.4 | 0.67 | 0 | 1 | 0.44 | 0.56 |
Morocco | 0.17 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 0.73 | NA | NA |
Peru | 0.42 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.97 | 1 | 0 |
Philippines | 0.41 | 0.8 | 0.67 | 0 | 0.63 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
Poland | 0.87 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.74 | 0 | 1 |
Portugal | 0.96 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.89 | 0.65 | 0.35 |
Romania | 0.54 | 1 | 0.67 | 0 | 1 | 0.58 | 0.42 |
Slovakia | 0.84 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.99 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
South Africa | 0.19 | 1 | 0.67 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Sri Lanka | 0.39 | 1 | 0.67 | 1 | 0 | NA | NA |
Thailand | 0.46 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.71 | 0 | 0.98 | 0.02 |
Turkey | 0.39 | 1 | 0.67 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.98 |