From: Translation, cultural adaptation and field-testing of the Thinking Healthy Program for Vietnam
Participants (n = 6) | Commune and Women’s Union representatives (n = 2) | |
---|---|---|
Value of activities done at home for putting into practice concepts covered in the session | ||
Extremely useful | 5 | 2 |
Useful | 1 | - |
A little useful | - | - |
Not useful at all | - | - |
The three step structure to thinking healthy made it easy to understand and practice healthy thinking and healthy actions | ||
Strongly agree | 3 | 2 |
Agree | 3 | - |
Neutral | - | - |
Disagree | - | - |
Strongly disagree | - | - |
Comprehensibility of language used | ||
All understandable | 6 | 2 |
Somewhat understandable | - | - |
Somewhat difficult to understand | - | - |
Mostly difficult to understand | - | - |
Comprehensibility of content | ||
Easy to understand | - | |
Understandable | 6 | 2 |
Somewhat understandable | - | - |
Difficult to understand | - | - |
Utility of program to pregnant women in the community | ||
Extremely useful | 5 | 2 |
Useful | 1 | - |
A little useful | - | - |
Not useful at all | - | - |
Most suitable trainers for the program | ||
Commune health station health worker | 5 | 2 |
Village health worker | - | - |
Commune women’s union member | 2 | 1 |
Village women’s union member | - | - |