Skip to main content

Table 4 Principal Recipient communication and relationship with other Global Fund actors

From: Implementing Global Fund programs: a survey of opinions and experiences of the Principal Recipients across 69 countries

  Respondents who agreed with the statement
Statement area Overall number (%) Government number (%) Non-govt number (%) Overall SS Africa number (%) Other countries number (%)
Adequacy of communication with other actors       
Organization has adequate communication with FPM (n=105) 91 (86) 23 (82) 68 (88) 84 (87) 35 (80) 49 (92)
Organization has adequate communication with CCM (n=105) 76 (73) 24 (86) 52 (68) 72 (74) 29 (66) 43 (81)
Organization has adequate communication with LFA (n=105) 87 (82) 25 (89) 62 (81) 83 (86) 37 (84) 46 (87)
Organization has adequate communication with SRs (n=91) 84 (92) 21 (92) 63 (93) 81 (93) 35 (90) 46 (95)
Response time to queries       
FPM responds to queries in a timely manner (n=104) 74 (71) 15 (56) 59 (76) 69 (72) 25 (59) 44 (83)
CCM responds to queries in a timely manner (n=105) 54 (51) 17 (61) 37 (48) 50 (51) 18 (41) 32 (60)
LFA responds to queries in a timely manner (n=105) 61 (58) 17 (61) 44 (57) 59 (60) 20 (46) 39 (73)
SRs responds to queries in a timely manner (n=91) 61 (67) 13 (57) 48 (71) 60 (69) 21 (54) 39 (81)
Overall nature of the working relationship       
Organization has good relations with the FPM (n=104) 88 (84) 22 (82) 66 (86) 81 (84) 33 (77) 48 (90)
Organization has good relations with the CCM (n=105) 79 (75) 24 (86) 55 (71) 74 (76) 33 (75) 41 (77)
Organization has good relations with the LFA (n=105) 77 (74) 21 (75) 56 (73) 72 (74) 31 (80) 41 (77)
Organization has good relations with the SRs (n=91) 85 (93) 20 (87) 65 (96) 81 (93) 35 (90) 46 (95)