Table 4 Principal Recipient communication and relationship with other Global Fund actors
Respondents who agreed with the statement | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Statement area | Overall number (%) | Government number (%) | Non-govt number (%) | Overall | SS Africa number (%) | Other countries number (%) |
Adequacy of communication with other actors | ||||||
Organization has adequate communication with FPM (n=105) | 91 (86) | 23 (82) | 68 (88) | 84 (87) | 35 (80) | 49 (92) |
Organization has adequate communication with CCM (n=105) | 76 (73) | 24 (86) | 52 (68) | 72 (74) | 29 (66) | 43 (81) |
Organization has adequate communication with LFA (n=105) | 87 (82) | 25 (89) | 62 (81) | 83 (86) | 37 (84) | 46 (87) |
Organization has adequate communication with SRs (n=91) | 84 (92) | 21 (92) | 63 (93) | 81 (93) | 35 (90) | 46 (95) |
Response time to queries | ||||||
FPM responds to queries in a timely manner (n=104) | 74 (71) | 15 (56) | 59 (76) | 69 (72) | 25 (59) | 44 (83) |
CCM responds to queries in a timely manner (n=105) | 54 (51) | 17 (61) | 37 (48) | 50 (51) | 18 (41) | 32 (60) |
LFA responds to queries in a timely manner (n=105) | 61 (58) | 17 (61) | 44 (57) | 59 (60) | 20 (46) | 39 (73) |
SRs responds to queries in a timely manner (n=91) | 61 (67) | 13 (57) | 48 (71) | 60 (69) | 21 (54) | 39 (81) |
Overall nature of the working relationship | ||||||
Organization has good relations with the FPM (n=104) | 88 (84) | 22 (82) | 66 (86) | 81 (84) | 33 (77) | 48 (90) |
Organization has good relations with the CCM (n=105) | 79 (75) | 24 (86) | 55 (71) | 74 (76) | 33 (75) | 41 (77) |
Organization has good relations with the LFA (n=105) | 77 (74) | 21 (75) | 56 (73) | 72 (74) | 31 (80) | 41 (77) |
Organization has good relations with the SRs (n=91) | 85 (93) | 20 (87) | 65 (96) | 81 (93) | 35 (90) | 46 (95) |